HomePoliticsThe Right GOP Gun...

The Right GOP Gun Bill Is No Bill At All

Washington – Republicans outside a small group of senators negotiating a potential bipartisan arms control deal aren’t exactly happy with the group’s success.

Several Republican lawmakers told HuffPost this week that when it comes to federal law and guns, the status quo is good, despite the occasional high-profile mass shootings.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Green (GA) said she does not support any new gun laws.

“We don’t need to. “We have one, it’s called the Second Amendment,” he said. “Murder is illegal.”

Also, Congressman Chip Roy (Texas) said Democrats don’t talk about real solutions.

“We’re not talking about safety in schools. We’re not talking about all the cultural nonsense that’s going on,” he said.

Green’s position is more specific than many Republicans want to express. Being careful Bipartisan arms negotiations in the SenateOther Republicans in Congress have taken a more forward -looking and forward -looking approach, saying they want to assess what will come out of those negotiations before declaring if they can support any change.

While the Senate group is still active, it allows those not involved in the negotiations to step back and avoid details.

Twelve-time House member Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), who grew up in gun culture, along with Hobby’s father, who made hand weapons and campaigned in 1984 to take over the state legislature, has faint “God bless the ‘NRA” sticker on pickup.

“I do not know. “I don’t want to disclose it yet,” he said Wednesday in a vote on the Democratic Arms Safety Bill. “There are common sense reforms you can make.”

Some Senate Republicans not involved in the ongoing negotiations are also reluctant to say whether they support specific changes. Some senators told HuffPost that they are not opposed to the idea of ​​raising the age for buying weapons, but they do not want to accept it.

“It’s good that members on both sides aren’t eliminating different provisions now,” said Senator Todd Young, Ind., Who boasted an A + rating from the National Weapons Association’s Political Victory Fund when it ran for the Senate. In 2016. “So let’s see when they come back, what the bipartisan purchase package has and I’ll discuss it very strongly.”

Negotiations in the Senate are important exercises in verifying whether Republicans will agree to small changes to the federal background check process that they typically oppose in exchange for everything related to mental health and school safety. . House Republicans are not on the table.

“In short, I don’t think the answer is to limit the number of good people with guns and limit the right to self -defense. “Above,” said the rep. Bob Good (R-Va.).

“You can’t make a law about evil to get rid of it,” he said.

Congressman Tom Cole (R-Okla.) Said he closely monitors Senate negotiations and pushes the boundaries of a bipartisan approach.

“I knew there was a serious attempt to do something. He’s not here. So if someone passes, at a particularly significant margin, where it’s not 60 [votes]“But it was in the’ 70s – then I would sit down and look, ”he said.

Cole acknowledged that the new gun restrictions faced huge opportunities with his peers. “I think most Republicans are unlikely to vote and leave it to the states, but, again, wait and see what they do,” he told the Senate.

This tendency to offer details contrasts with the democratic proposals in the two bills in the House this week. The key provisions of Wednesday’s bill and the number of GOP votes received include:

  • Prohibition on the purchase of semi-automatic weapons for children under 21 years of age (10 votes)

  • Tighter restrictions on “buying” weapons (Seven votes)

  • Uninvestigated “ghost weapons” (Eight votes)

  • Request gun safes or safe areas if weapons are stored where minors can access (Three items)

  • Limit shocks and high -capacity weapon magazines (13 votes)

Thursday’s bill would outline a federal version of red flag laws at the state level that would make it illegal for people who endanger themselves or others to own or take a gun.

Although both bills have already been passed, they are reserved for consideration in the Senate and each received only five votes from House Republicans – and only one in five is fighting for re -election.

Not all Republicans are vague. Representative. Mario Diaz-Ballart (Fl.) Announced. Two specific invoices – One is its author, the other is co-sponsored by a Democratic MP- who, according to him, will receive the support of both parties if he leaves.

“There are a lot of bills that will really have a chance to become law and, more importantly, they can really help save lives,” he said.

But the bills Diaz-Ballart mentioned are less comprehensive than the democratic measures. One has established a federal clearinghouse to share school safety best practices, while the other requires the U.S. Intelligence National Threat Assessment Center, which studies targeted violent attacks, to -investigate violence in schools, and offer training in the prevention of violence in schools.

Asked to name a change he could support, Roy said he wanted to look at laws that would allow people with mental health problems to get involved. Cole said he supports mental health education and firearms, as well as encouraging states to adopt their own red flag laws.

And, when pressed, Simpson mentioned that he had voted in the past to ask to sell ratchet locks with guns.

“You’re watching the rise at age 21 [for buying assault weapons]”It’s probably not a big deal, because you need 21 more to buy a gun,” he said.

The waiting period of “a few more days” would be uncomfortable for gun buyers because of expanded background checks, he said, but “you can probably tolerate things like that.”

Simpson said it’s not yet in the air if the political environment has changed under the threat of guns, though he added that “the feeling has changed.”

Congressman Brian Fitzpatrick (RPA), who supported the bill in both houses this week, said it’s not enough to just “harden” schools and check mental health and firearms.

“There’s a legislative component: people shouldn’t be afraid to face it,” he said. “You have to do it.”

Source: Huffpost

- A word from our sponsors -

Most Popular

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

More from Author

- A word from our sponsors -

Read Now