adUnits.push({
code: ‘Rpp_tecnologia_moviles_Nota_Interna1’,
mediaTypes: {
banner: {
sizes: (navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i)) ? [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100]] : [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100], [635, 90]]
}
},
bids: [{
bidder: ‘appnexus’,
params: {
placementId: ‘14149971’
}
},{
bidder: ‘rubicon’,
params: {
accountId: ‘19264’,
siteId: ‘314342’,
zoneId: ‘1604128’
}
},{
bidder: ‘amx’,
params: {
tagId: ‘MTUybWVkaWEuY29t’
}
},{
bidder: ‘oftmedia’,
params: {
placementId: navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i) ? ‘22617692’: ‘22617693’
}
}]
});
legal battle between Ericsson and Apple for the apparent unauthorized use of patents in iPhone D ipad with connection 5G was a clear victory for the Swedish company in Colombiawhere the sale and import of these devices is prohibited.
Mansana was looking for that Ericsson be punished in the United States for this injunction imposed by a judge in Colombia.
The Cupertino-based company unsuccessfully sought legal action. Texas impose Ericsson payments for losses caused by the ban, indicates a specialized site Foss Patents.
Judge Rodney Gildstrap denied the request for Mansana and even responded with abuse.
Why did they pay attention to Apple?
Judge Gildstrap drew attention to Mansana for using the emergency petition on this matter.
According to him, the ban in Colombia did not mean “inevitable and irreparable” damage, as he claims. Mansanaespecially when the dispute goes to court in December and it is expected that Mansana D Ericsson they will have to enter into formal mediation in September.
Gildstrap claimed that Mansana he abused the emergency petition and that he would not hesitate to punish the company if he did something like that again.
Apple denounces “human rights violation”
As noted Foss Patents, Mansana does not renounce legal attack on Ericsson and now he’s asking Colombia to lift the ban, which he called a “violation of human rights.”
“Tutela,” similar to amparo’s lawsuit, is asking the Supreme Court of the Judicial District of Bogotá to take action against Ericsson, the firm representing Ericsson in Colombia (OlarteMoore), Carlos R. Olarte (head counsel representing Ericsson in the dispute), and the 43rd civil court (which accepted the ban).
BUT Mansana he did not like that the distributors in Colombia contacted to make sure they are aware of the ban on the sale of models iPhone D ipad With 5G connection. Foss Patents remember this Mansana did the same thing 10 years ago when he was instead Ericsson and had a patent dispute with Samsung.
Obviously, Mansana will seek to pay as little as possible for the use of patents Ericssonwhile the Swedish company will try to get the most pay by hitting where it hurts. Mansanaselling their iPhone. Until these companies agree, this romance will last for some time.
Source: RPP
I’m Liza Grey, an experienced news writer and author at the Buna Times. I specialize in writing about economic issues, with a focus on uncovering stories that have a positive impact on society. With over seven years of experience in the news industry, I am highly knowledgeable about current events and the ways in which they affect our daily lives.