Herman Small Arana: Yennefer Paredes and Jose Medina should be kept in maximum security prisons

Criminal lawyer and former Executive Director of INPE, German Lesser Aranareferred to the case of Yenifer Paredes, sister-in-law of President Pedro Castillo, and stated that, according to the characteristics of the crime with which she was charged, must be transferred to a maximum security prison. According to Little Aran, the sister of the first lady, Lilia Paredes, will have to be admitted to hospital. Chorrillos Correctional Institution Annexknown as Santa Monica.

“In our prison system, we have three mechanisms: closed, semi-open and open. We use a closed system more and we also have three parts in it: minimum, medium and maximum security. Given the crime for which he is admitted, for organized crime, she must be in a regular institution of the closed regime. But if it does not have these environments, then they should be placed in conditions of maximum security. News extension from PTR.

Similarly, the mayor of Anguia, José Nenil Medina, is to be transferred to a maximum security prison after Judge Johnny Gomez Balboa decided to grant the prosecutor’s request and order 30 months of pre-trial detention against both for alleged crimes. criminal organization, aggravated conspiracy and money laundering.

The case of Antauro Humala: The atonement of the sentence is the responsibility of the director of the penitentiary

little spider He also commented on the release of ethnocaserist leader Antauro Humal, who was released from prison on August 20 last year by order of the INPE. For the former Dean of Law of the National University of San Marcos, the figure of the atonement of the sentence corresponds to the director of the penitentiary and gives him the opportunity to grant the final freedom.

“In Peru, we have three codes: one Criminal Code, one Procedural Code and another Penitentiary Code. The latter has its own objective principles and purpose. Article 22 states: “Dismissal from a penitentiary institution can only be carried out by the competent authorities.” In this case, the judge will be competent in certain forms of freedom: parole, probation, change of appearance, etc. The President will be competent in clemency, Congress will be competent in amnesty, and the only case when the prison power, in in this case, the director of the penitentiary, intended to grant final freedom with the repayment of the sentence. This ultimate freedom consists of the sum of the effective imprisonment plus the time for the settlement of the sentence,” he argued.

Finally, he clarified that the indicated figure was an incentive for prisoners and, with the exception of offenses against sexual honor, did not require a psychological examination..

“Sentence reduction is an incentive for the prison population to allow more people to work and study. The only way to rehabilitate prisoners is through work, education and discipline (…). In crimes against freedom and sexual honor, as a rule, in the rape of minors, a psychiatric, psychological examination is required. But in this case, this is not mentioned,” he concluded.