adUnits.push({
code: ‘Rpp_politica_actualidad_Nota_Interna1’,
mediaTypes: {
banner: {
sizes: (navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i)) ? [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100]] : [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100], [635, 90]]
}
},
bids: [{
bidder: ‘appnexus’,
params: {
placementId: ‘14149971’
}
},{
bidder: ‘rubicon’,
params: {
accountId: ‘19264’,
siteId: ‘314342’,
zoneId: ‘1604128’
}
},{
bidder: ‘amx’,
params: {
tagId: ‘MTUybWVkaWEuY29t’
}
},{
bidder: ‘oftmedia’,
params: {
placementId: navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i) ? ‘22617692’: ‘22617693’
}
}]
});
prosecutor’s office conducts five preliminary investigations against the President of the Republic, Pedro Castillo. As a result, the criminal defense lawyer Mario Amoretti He emphasized what the Constitution says.
“The Constitution is very clear, you cannot be charged, (but) nowhere in it is there a reference that you cannot be under investigation. These are two completely different situations from a procedural and legal point of view, ”he emphasized in News extension from PTR.
The lawyer also referred to the decision Peter’s castle keep quiet and don’t answer questions Attorney of the Nationin the case of promotion in the army and police.
“The fact of silence is a constitutional and international law, but a person is not tried, he is not sentenced, he is not asked for preventive detention for what he said or did not say,” he said.
“Each defendant will be able to establish whether he participated or not, with other testimony, other tests, other statements. The fact that he is silent does not mean that absolutely nothing will be proven, ”he said. Amoretti.
Pedro Castillo did not answer questions
The President of the Republic, Pedro Castillo, went to the ministry’s headquarters last Thursday to appear before National Prosecutor Patricia Benavidez, who called him to testify about alleged interference in the promotion process of military officers. national police.
Lawyer Benji Espinoza found that the President Peter’s castle he invoked his constitutional right to refrain from answering questions from the prosecutor’s office. He pointed out that the President only replied “common law” and in a voluntary statement denied the charges against him and maintained his innocence.
“He then indicated that later, when he was called, he was going to testify, but for now he was going to exercise his constitutional, legal and convention right to remain silent,” he said.
Espinoza confirmed that “within the dynamics of the investigation” fiscal investigations are carried out every day in the five cases brought against Castillo, and that for this reason “it is better that the President respond to all (and not only) part of it; so it will be later, when all the information is collected, the president will give all the relevant explanations.”
Source: RPP
I’m Liza Grey, an experienced news writer and author at the Buna Times. I specialize in writing about economic issues, with a focus on uncovering stories that have a positive impact on society. With over seven years of experience in the news industry, I am highly knowledgeable about current events and the ways in which they affect our daily lives.