Carlos Anderson: “We are working on a good vacancy because we had poorly reasoned applications”

Congressman Carlos Anderson (not in the group) indicated he was working on a new presidential job application Considering that, as he pointed out, there are sufficient arguments to justify “permanent moral incompetence” president Peter’s castle.

“We work, of course (…) When you constantly check that something is happening systematicallyyou can say there is failure to to distinguish good from evil, public from private, which we observe more than once, but every month this year. So I guess that’s not all enough elements have a movement of vacancies in this nature,” he explained.

Anderon noted that the new movement would have to “be young” considering what he thought the previous ones were “ill-argued from a legal point of view, from the point of view of the chronological narration of facts, because the permanent moral incompetence cannot be measured by one fact”.

Belief

In this sense, the parliamentarian referred to the fact that obtaining votes to close the presidential vacancy “It’s a compelling challenge” for those parliamentarians of “good will”.

“As for the rest, I consider it the task of a citizen to identify them, expose them, confront them and ask directly: with all this evidence, how can you support the president? What arguments can you vote against vacancies?” he said.

In this regard, Carlos Anderson believed that “there is a very large group of congressmen who were caught, bought, convinced by the Executive” and that the pending task is to “begin to know them.”

He also stressed that the government “has long lost confidence and is losing legitimacy every day.”

“I am one of those who believe that the President has been delegitimized at such a high level that today, if we accept that the President of the Republic represents the nation, this means there are 5 open tax processes in the country. This is what confuses any Peruvian,” he said.

Departure of Hannibal Torres

On the other hand, with regard to the possible departure of Anibal Torres from the post of Chairman of the Council of Ministers (CPM), Anderson considered that the chief of staff did not fulfill his main function.

“I’ve been saying this all this time, did it solve any problem? Has it helped bring about a better convergence between the executive and the legislature? This is your task (…) There was nothing (…) ) political in its rapprochement with the opposition and I sincerely believe that ultimately plays a negative role. somehow improve the political dialogue,” he said.

Similarly, he believed that any change in the cabinet “won’t last long”.