adUnits.push({
code: ‘Rpp_politica_congreso_Nota_Interna1’,
mediaTypes: {
banner: {
sizes: (navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i)) ? [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100]] : [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100], [635, 90]]
}
},
bids: [{
bidder: ‘appnexus’,
params: {
placementId: ‘14149971’
}
},{
bidder: ‘rubicon’,
params: {
accountId: ‘19264’,
siteId: ‘314342’,
zoneId: ‘1604128’
}
},{
bidder: ‘amx’,
params: {
tagId: ‘MTUybWVkaWEuY29t’
}
},{
bidder: ‘oftmedia’,
params: {
placementId: navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i) ? ‘22617692’: ‘22617693’
}
}]
});
Eduardo Pachas, a lawyer for former President Pedro Castillo, said this Wednesday that his client wants to testify in person before the court. Parliamentary Audit Committee to defend themselves in the framework of the investigation carried out by this working group for Angia’s case.
Speaking with Rotary ethereal night edition RPP Noticias, lawyer said he had submitted an application to a commission chaired by a parliamentarian Hector Ventura so that members of the working group can come to collect the application of the ex-president or, in any case, that he be allowed to leave Diroes to carry it out.
“I have submitted (brief) to Congress where we ask that the statement be made in person, whether the commission goes to jail or whether they allow the president to come out to testify, because the INPE authorities are happy to do the procedure. “, – said the lawyer of the former president.
He also added that the commission had already agreed to a similar situation when it collected evidence from the untried businessman Zamir Villaverde. Then a group of deputies went to the prison, where they interrogated the defendant.
Absence from the Control Commission
Former President Pedro Castillo did not virtually appear to testify before the Review Commission of the Congress of the Republic, where he was scheduled to testify as part of the Anguía investigation. When the meeting began, the chairman of the commission allowed him to join; however, there was no response.
“He didn’t show up. He didn’t show up. He said he wouldn’t participate. He was threatened and made it clear he wouldn’t participate,” said Hugo Chang, a Barbadillo prison administrator who was present at the call.
In this regard, Hector Ventura pointed out in Everything is known from RPP News that Pedro Castillo for the second time obstructed the progress of the investigation conducted by the Supervisory Commission.
“This is the common denominator of an opaque attitude towards what was management Pedro Castillo. Repeatedly in the Sarratea case, we quoted Castillo as lying to the country he was about to go to. He asked to program a summons to receive us at the Government Palace and hide in statements to the National Prosecutor’s Office,” he said.
“For the second time, this hinders the development of the Supervisory Commission. This is a common denominator of illegal behavior, not transparent to Pedro Castilloby being notified in accordance with Article 97 of our Constitution. He has a legal obligation to testify about these crimes,” he added.
Source: RPP
I am Emma White and I currently work for Buna Times. My specialty is the politics section of the website, where I aim to provide readers with informative and engaging content on current events. In addition to my professional experience in journalism, I hold a Bachelor’s degree in English Literature from Princeton University.