Kansas voters (USA) voted overwhelmingly in Tuesday’s referendum in favor of retaining the right to abortion as it is currently governed by the state constitution, defeating conservatives who have sought to limit it.
According to the forecasts of the chief American mediawith 90% of the vote counted, more than 60% of voters rejected a change to the state constitution that would restrict the right to abortion.
“The voters of Kansas went to the polls in record numbers to counter extremist efforts to amend the state constitution to deprive women of the right to vote,” the president said in a statement. Joe Biden.
“This vote clarifies what we already know: the majority of Americans agree that women should have access to abortion and they should have the right to make their own health decisions,” the president added.
from Kansas This was the first referendum held by a US state since the decision Supreme which overturned Roe v. Wade, which removed the federal right to abortion and gave states the power to legislate on the issue.
The consultation, which was held on Tuesday to coincide with the state’s primary, could open the door for Government the state passes laws restricting the right to abortionwhich, however, will now remain legal until 22 weeks.
This was a particularly important referendum because it could set a precedent for other states.
Despite the Democratic governor, Laura Kellycentral state Kansas It has a strong Republican tradition and the party controls the offices of the attorney general, secretary of state, and both houses of the state legislature.
In addition, the presidential elections are also dominated by Republicans and Donald Trump he was the presidential candidate’s favorite in the last two elections, with 56% of the vote.
Referendum
Tuesday’s referendum was heavily criticized by civil society groups, who said the text of the question was not clear enough in an attempt to “misinform and confuse those who oppose abortion,” according to the organization. Planned parenthood.
In the event that a “yes” vote was forced on constitutional reform, the state legislature would be responsible for approving laws of procedure that could opt for greater time limits or exceptions or outright prohibition, as happens in other states.
From June 24 Supreme Court — with a Conservative majority of six to three Progressives — will end federal protection of the right to abortion (in force since 1973 thanks to a ruling “Rowe vs. Wade”), many women from the states like Texas, Oklahoma and Missouri let’s go to Kansas be able to terminate, given the restrictions imposed in those states.
A few hours earlier on Tuesday, the Attorney General USAMerrick Garland, announced a lawsuit against the state of Idaho because its anti-abortion law “criminalizes doctors” and does not allow them to freely practice abortion when a woman’s health is in danger.
Litigation against Idaho
Ministry of Justice sued Idaho for violating the federal Labor and Emergency Medical Act in an attempt to protect physicians who are forced to intervene when abortion is “a medical treatment necessary to stabilize a patient’s emergency.”
This is the first action by the Ministry of Justice against the state since the decision of the Supreme Court, and it will not be the only one, as explained at a press conference. Garland.
The prosecutor indicated that the Reproductive Rights Working Group, created as a result of the Supreme Court decision, is evaluating the “changing landscape of state laws” and “additional litigation” against other states is already being studied.
All this in order to “do everything we can to ensure uninterrupted legal access to reproductive services” during these “terrifying and uncertain times for pregnant women and their providers,” the deputy attorney general said. USAVanita Gupta.
Today’s complaint seeks to end this Idaho law, which goes into effect Aug. 25, and places on doctors the burden of proving their innocence in court after arrest and arraignment.
(EFE)
Source: RPP
I’m Liza Grey, an experienced news writer and author at the Buna Times. I specialize in writing about economic issues, with a focus on uncovering stories that have a positive impact on society. With over seven years of experience in the news industry, I am highly knowledgeable about current events and the ways in which they affect our daily lives.