Facebook Pinterest Tumblr
  • News
  • World
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • Healthcare
  • More
    • Lifestyle
    • Opinion
    • Automobiles
    • Markets
    • Economy
Search
Buna Times
Buna Times
  • News
  • World
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • Healthcare
  • More
    • Lifestyle
    • Opinion
    • Automobiles
    • Markets
    • Economy
HomeWorldThe Supreme Court explained...
July 5, 2024

The Supreme Court explained whether it is possible to take sentences out of the context of a publication when refuting it

By David
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
WhatsApp


    In order to recognize information expressed in one sentence as false, it is necessary to evaluate it in the context of the entire publication, according to the decision of the Cassation Civil Court of the Supreme Court

    .in_text_content_22 { width: 300px; height: 600px; } @media(min-width: 600px) { .in_text_content_22 { width: 580px; height: 400px; } }

    .

    The press service of the Supreme Court said in a statement that when deciding whether to recognize information as unreliable through one sentence in a publication and its refutation, the court must evaluate the content and direction of the entire publication (its context). One sentence should not be “torn out” of the context of the entire publication when refuting it.

    This conclusion was made by the Supreme Court as part of a panel of judges of the First Chamber of the Cassation Civil Court on a claim for the protection of honor, dignity and business reputation, the obligation to refute information, and compensation for moral damage.

    The plaintiff pointed out that the Ukrainian MP, in an interview with the Pryamiy TV channel, expressed false information about him, which discredited his honor, dignity and business reputation. This information was disseminated in videos and articles on the Internet. The defendants in the dispute were the author of the statements and the television and radio organization that provided the broadcast of the relevant program.

    The court of first instance granted the claim. The appellate court changed this decision, indicating that not all statements may be the subject of a violation of the honor, dignity and business reputation of an individual. The appellate court recognized that only one statement was unreliable and discredited the honor, dignity and business reputation of the plaintiff, and therefore subject to refutation, since it contained both a statement about a specific circumstance and the negative nature of the statement, the veracity of which would require proof during the consideration of the case.

    The Supreme Court of Justice overturned the previous court decisions in the contested part and refused to satisfy the claim in this part.

    The Supreme Court pointed out the erroneousness of such a conclusion by the courts, since in fact the court obliged the defendant to refute information regarding other persons who are essentially mentioned in the context of the entire publication, that is, persons who are not participants in this case and did not apply to the court for the protection of their rights and interests.

    Having recognized part of the defendant’s statement as value judgments and the other part as factual statements, the appellate court did not take into account the actual content of the statement as a whole, its context, or its overall direction.

    In his statements on the merits, the defendant repeatedly drew the courts’ attention to the circumstances mentioned, but the courts did not give a proper legal assessment of his arguments. In addition, the defendant noted that the statements contested by the plaintiff were taken out of the context of the entire publication, they were exclusively criticism of the activities, assessment of the actions of other public figures and did not concern the plaintiff.

    The Supreme Court agreed with such arguments of the cassation appeal, since, recognizing the information in the form of one sentence as unreliable and refuting it, the court did not pay attention to the fact that the court must take into account, evaluate the content and direction of the entire publication (its context). Therefore, one sentence should not be “torn out” of the context of the entire publication when refuting it.

    The court of cassation noted that the sentence, which contained information recognized as unreliable by the appellate court, did not contain any factual data on the actions of the plaintiff, the method, or the method of committing illegal actions. Thus, the use of the words “some” and “derebant” indicates that the author of the information expresses his opinion in order to draw attention to a matter of public interest, and not to state a fact.

    The panel of judges also emphasized that the plaintiff’s public status and the public interest in him in the performance of his duties indicate broader boundaries of acceptable criticism towards him.

    Source: Racurs

    David
    David

    I am David Wyatt, a professional writer and journalist for Buna Times. I specialize in the world section of news coverage, where I bring to light stories and issues that affect us globally. As a graduate of Journalism, I have always had the passion to spread knowledge through writing.

    Related

    - A word from our sponsors -

    Most Popular

    Kharkov Bun: increased number of victims

    The first teaser of Abbey Downton movie went out

    Actress Luselia Santush arrives at the Russian Federation

    The DPRK was promised by the “unclear” Poddjakke of Russia in the war against Ukraine

    • Tags
    • Supreme Court

    LEAVE A REPLY Cancel reply

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here
    You have entered an incorrect email address!
    Please enter your email address here

    Previous article
    Shmygal’s resignation is impossible without changing the legislation, Servant of the People stated
    Next article
    Horoscope for all zodiac signs for the first weekend of July 2024

    More from Author

    World

    Kharkov Bun: increased number of victims

    David -
    Entertainment

    The first teaser of Abbey Downton movie went out

    John -
    Lifestyle

    Actress Luselia Santush arrives at the Russian Federation

    Jack -
    World

    The DPRK was promised by the “unclear” Poddjakke of Russia in the war against Ukraine

    Russian military criminal, secretary of the Russian...
    David -

    - A word from our sponsors -

    Read Now

    Kharkov Bun: increased number of victims

    The first teaser of Abbey Downton movie went out

    Actress Luselia Santush arrives at the Russian Federation

    The DPRK was promised by the “unclear” Poddjakke of Russia in the war against Ukraine

    Russian military criminal, secretary of the Russian Council Sergey Shayga, visited Phogyan, where he met with Kim Jong. He promised him that the DPRK would support Russia, in particular, in the war against Ukraine. The parties discussed a joint operation in the Kursk...

    Japanese scientists have developed plastic, which melts in the sea

    In Pryluky, RF Postal House -Topl in the leader of the leader

    In Pryluky, a hostile drone hit the house of the head of the local fire department. .in_text_content_22 {width: 300px; Height: 600px; } @Media (min-width: 600px) {.in_text_content_22 {width: 580px; Height: 400px; }} .Adsbygoogle {Touch-Action: Manipulation; } His family was killed: his wife,...

    The armed forces of the armed forces of the armed forces more than 60 attacks in the direction of Pokrovsky

    RF terrorist at night was beaten by Shahmed on Priluki and Kharkov, many deaths (photo, video)

    Five people were killed from the Russian attack with drones in Priluki in the inkworm. .in_text_content_22 {width: 300px; Height: 600px; } @Media (min-width: 600px) {.in_text_content_22 {width: 580px; Height: 400px; }} .Adsbygoogle {Touch-Action: Manipulation; } Among the dead is two women and...

    RESULTS 04.06: Putin’s Statement and Comment Trump

    Sweden rented 600 seats in Estonian prisons

    Debut “Major”: The Ukrainian team went to the second stage

    Kremlin’s “Kuwhka” reserves were reduced to a minimum of 2019 – the media

    Buna Time
    • DMCA
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising and Outreach

    All Rights Reserved © 2023 - Buna Times