WASHINGTON (AP) – A former Trump White House official, Peter Navarro, was accused Friday of refusing to cooperate with a Congressional investigation. Attack on January 6 At the U.S. Capitol, however, the Department of Justice pardoned two other counsel, including former chief of staff Mark Meadows.
The department’s decision to prosecute Meadows and another adviser to former President Donald Trump, Dan Scavino, was announced in a letter sent Friday by the federal prosecutor to a Chamber attorney. The move was made hours after the indictment and Navarro was subsequently fired after a court hearing in which he vowed to challenge the allegations in Congress.
The hype about the activities came just days before a chamber committee took the lead in investigating the riots at the Capitol. Prime-time listening Aims to present the evidence it has gathered about the attack on the American public. It shows how the Justice Department chose to merely review disrespectful appeals from Congress rather than automatically settle charges against each of Trump’s aides who resisted Congressional subpoenas.
Although the Justice Department has sued many of Trump’s aides for possible prosecution for refusing to cooperate, Navarro is only the second person to face criminal charges, following allegations made by the former White adviser. House Steve Bennon last fall.
The 72-year-old Navarro was charged with an insult count for failing to appear before the chamber commission for deposition and a second case for requesting commission documents.
Speaking in court for the first time on Friday, Navarro said the Department of Justice had made a “misdemeanor charge” and said he could not contact anyone after an FBI agent arrived at the airport on Friday and claimed it. He said he was arrested while trying to fly to Nashville, Tennessee to appear on television.
“Are these people gin? This is not America, ”Navarro said. “I’ve been a prominent public official for four years!”
At the hearing, he said the House committee was an “imaginary committee” and said prosecutors were “playing hard” and they were “disgusting”. In the event of a conviction, each case involves at least one month in prison and a maximum of one year behind bars.
The Justice Department and Attorney General Merrick Garland are under pressure to decide more quickly whether or not to punish other Trump aides who similarly oppose the House panel meeting.
უ New York Times For the first time, information on the tax ban spread to Prati and Scavino. The decision was made publicly by an unknown person who was not authorized to discuss it in public, he confirmed to The Associated Press on Friday.
The prosecution states that Navarro, when called to testify before the committee, refused to do so and instead told the panel that because Trump sought executive privilege, “my hands were tied.”
After committee officials told him they believed there were topics they could discuss without worrying about executive privileges, Navarro again refused and ordered the committee to negotiate directly with Trump’s lawyers, according to the indictment. . The committee resumed its scheduled deposition on March 2, but Navarro did not attend.
The indictment came just days after Navarro revealed in court that he was also summoned to appear before a grand jury this week as part of the Justice Department’s larger investigation into a deadly U.S. Capitol uprising.
“This is a preemptive attack by the prosecution against this lawsuit,” Navarro told magistrate judge Zia Farouk in court. “This is against good faith and due process.”
Navarro, who became Trump’s business advisor, said the FBI gave him to him at his Washington home last week. The citation is the first known case of prosecutors seeking testimony from someone who worked at the Trump White House while investigating the attack. Prosecutors said the indictment was filed Thursday night.
Navarro said in his lawsuit on Tuesday that the chamber selection committee investigating the attack was illegal and therefore his subpoena in February would not be enforced by law.
He sued committee members, President Nancy Pelosi, the state of California and the U.S. attorney in Washington, Matthew M. Against Graves, whose office is now considering a criminal case against him. .
In an interview with the Associated Press this week, Navarro said the scope of his lawsuit is broader than the subpoena, as part of the Supreme Court’s attempt to resolve several issues that led to an armament of a Congressional investigation. Powers “after Trump took office.
Select committee members asked Navarro to testify about his efforts publicly to help Trump ahead of the 2020 presidential election, including a plea to encourage state lawmakers to join their efforts.
The former economics professor was one of the White House staff who helped with Trump’s baseless allegations of widespread election fraud. Trump, for his part, contributed to Navarro’s extensive report released in December 2020, in which he falsely asserted that Navarro contained “more than enough” evidence of alleged misconduct. conduct and electoral fraud to win over his former boss.
Committee members at the time confirmed that Scavino and Navarro were among the few people who refused the committee’s request and information.
Despite opposition from many of Trump’s allies, the Jan.6 jury, made up of seven Democrats and two Republicans, was able to interview more than 1,000 witnesses about the uprising over the past 11 months and is now preparing begin a series of public hearings. . Next Sunday. Jury lawmakers hope the half-dozen hearings will be a public exposition of the causes and consequences of the internal attack on the U.S. government.
Source: Huffpost
I am David Wyatt, a professional writer and journalist for Buna Times. I specialize in the world section of news coverage, where I bring to light stories and issues that affect us globally. As a graduate of Journalism, I have always had the passion to spread knowledge through writing.