adUnits.push({
code: ‘Rpp_tecnologia_mas_tecnologia_Nota_Interna1’,
mediaTypes: {
banner: {
sizes: (navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i)) ? [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100]] : [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100], [635, 90]]
}
},
bids: [{
bidder: ‘appnexus’,
params: {
placementId: ‘14149971’
}
},{
bidder: ‘rubicon’,
params: {
accountId: ‘19264’,
siteId: ‘314342’,
zoneId: ‘1604128’
}
},{
bidder: ‘amx’,
params: {
tagId: ‘MTUybWVkaWEuY29t’
}
},{
bidder: ‘oftmedia’,
params: {
placementId: navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i) ? ‘22617692’: ‘22617693’
}
}]
});
judge Colombia resolved an autistic child’s right to health case using the ChatGPT robot by writing the first sentence of artificial intelligence in the country.
“This is a huge window, today it can be ChatGPTbut after three months, it could be any other alternative that facilitates the drafting of the texts and on which the judge relies, and not for the purpose of replacement,” said the judge in the case, Juan Manuel Padilla, in an interview with Blu Radio this Thursday.
That was his use
The January 30 ruling granted a mother’s request to exempt her autistic son from paying for medical appointments, therapy and transportation to hospitals because the family does not have the financial resources to take care of it.
Padilla ruled in favor of the minor and in the verdict says that he interrogated a conversational robot. ChatGPT to support your decision.
“Is an autistic minor exempt from moderator fees for his therapy?” the judge asks, and the application replies, “Yes, that’s right. Colombiaminors diagnosed with autism are exempt from moderator fees for their treatments.”
The sentence contains four similar questions and answers.
“Judges are not stupid, asking questions about the application, we do not cease to be judges, to be thinking beings,” explains Padilla.
The role of the secretary
According to then, ChatGPT it does what a “secretary” used to do, in an “organized, simple and structured way” that “may reduce response time in the judiciary”.
But Professor Juan David Gutiérrez of the Universidad del Rosario countered and started a debate on Twitter. In the message thread, the scientist asks the same questions as the judge, but gets different answers.
“As with other AI in other fields, under the banner of supposed effectiveness, fundamental rights are at risk,” he warned.
Since November, artificial intelligence ChatGPT it is spreading all over the world among adherents and skeptics.
The conversational robot, created by the Californian company OpenAI, works on the basis of algorithms and mountains of data.
Lawyers, engineers, journalists and others are wondering if this type of AI can replace them.
“I suspect that many of my colleagues will join this and begin ethically building their proposals with intelligence artificialPadilla launched. (AFP)
We recommend you METADATA, an RPP technology podcast. News, analytics, reviews, recommendations and everything you need to know about the world of technology.
Source: RPP
I am Ben Stock, a passionate and experienced digital journalist working in the news industry. At the Buna Times, I write articles covering technology developments and related topics. I strive to provide reliable information that my readers can trust. My research skills are top-notch, as well as my ability to craft engaging stories on timely topics with clarity and accuracy.