The congressional lawyer hopes that the TC will soon issue a precautionary resolution to avoid a possible closure of parliament.

Gerardo Cruz, a congressional lawyer and former judge on the Constitutional Court, indicated that the precautionary measure that the President of Congress had introduced with regard to the executive branch was intended to anticipate a possible closure of Parliament. In that sense, he said he expected the organization to make a statement to stop the government’s efforts.

“It is perfectly legal to make this demand and we will hope that as soon as possible a challenge to the executive branch will be issued with caution so that it refrains from any type of attitude that implies approval of the dissolution of Congress,” he said in the “Todo Se know” program. RPP.

Gerardo It noted that the protocol Chairman of the Council of Ministers which claims that the first question of confidence was rejected, violates two constitutional laws, and assures that if the government succeeds in shutting down Parliament, they will convene a Constituent Assembly.

“This turn we will have: a Constituent Assembly will be convened when the Congress is dissolved, it will not call for renewal for the remaining remnant, but rather for the creation of its assembly, and Peru will have a constitution within the socialism of the 21st century, which has led to the ruin of Latin American countries,” he said.

Congressional lawyer stressed that the impeachment of the president is necessary Pedro Castillo and he hopes they will get the votes to approve the vacancy.

“We are represented by an executive branch whose moral and constitutional wrongdoings are attested to by the Ministry of Public Administration.
and obviously there is also a political responsibility in parliament to take on the 87 votes to end once and for all this nightmare that we have a year and four months to date,” he said.

TC declares unfounded claim of unconstitutionality

The Plenum of the Constitutional Court this Wednesday declared unfounded the complaint of unconstitutionality submitted by the executive against Law 31399, by which the chairman of the Council of Ministers, Anibal Torres, raised the issue of confidence, which was also rejected by the Board of Directors. Congress.

“The Plenum of the Constitutional Court, by a majority vote, found unfounded the statement of the executive branch on the unconstitutionality of Law No. 31399, which strengthens the process of approving laws on constitutional reform, regulated by articles 40 and 44 of Law No. 26300 “Law on the rights of civil participation and control. The Tax Code conducts an exhaustive analysis of Law 31399 and decides that the norm does not contradict the Constitution,” the statement says.