The Supreme Court has dismissed Daniel Salaverri’s appeal to strike down the code of conduct for reporting his activities.

Daniel Salaverri, former president Congressyou must attend Power of attorney on the first working day of each month to justify their activities within the framework of the preparatory investigation conducted on the facts of alleged crimes related to theft for fraudulent purposes by appropriation and in favor of third parties, ideological lies and lies of a general nature to the detriment of the state.

Here is how it was decided Permanent Criminal Division of the Supreme Court declaring unfounded the appeal of the former legislator, through his legal defense, for the abolition of this rule of conduct imposed on him by the Chief Justice Juan Carlos Chekli, as well as the order of appearance with restrictions, which he issued in relation to the said defendant as a result of this case.

The Supreme Court also affirmed the expiration of the decision given by the said Justice of the Peace, in which Daniel Salaverri ordered bail of 10,000 soles to be paid within three working days of the decision.

In a ruling with which RPP Noticias concurred, the Supreme Court held that Chief Justice Chekley Soria’s decision did not contain a motivational defect that reduced procedural efficiency, as the former congressman’s defense argued in his appeal and, on the contrary, that decision was clear, precise, complete sufficient and justified.

Research work

Daniel Salaverri is under investigation public service for allegedly embezzling money provided by the General Administration of the Congressional Administration for their activities during the week of the representation, which allegedly did not take place in January and February 2017.

He is being prosecuted for the offenses of willful embezzlement by appropriation, willful embezzlement by appropriation for the benefit of third parties, and ideological lying or, alternatively, general lying to the detriment of the state.

The former parliamentarian is also under investigation for allegedly submitting falsified reports in support of alleged activities during the week of representation in January, February, November and December 2017 and January, February and March 2018.