adUnits.push({
code: ‘Rpp_politica_congreso_Nota_Interna1’,
mediaTypes: {
banner: {
sizes: (navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i)) ? [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100]] : [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100], [635, 90]]
}
},
bids: [{
bidder: ‘appnexus’,
params: {
placementId: ‘14149971’
}
},{
bidder: ‘rubicon’,
params: {
accountId: ‘19264’,
siteId: ‘314342’,
zoneId: ‘1604128’
}
},{
bidder: ‘amx’,
params: {
tagId: ‘MTUybWVkaWEuY29t’
}
},{
bidder: ‘oftmedia’,
params: {
placementId: navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i) ? ‘22617692’: ‘22617693’
}
}]
});
On Tuesday afternoon, the Standing Committee, led by Speaker of Parliament José Williams, unanimously approved three qualifying reports prepared by the Subcommittee on Constitutional Accusations (SAC), recommending admissibility of two constitutional complaints (Children of Y Caesar Chinostrosa) and another at one end, Congressman Freddie Diaz, accused of rape.
As a result, in accordance with letter d) of article 89 of the Rules of Congress, after the approval of these reports Subcommittee on Constitutional Charges a maximum period of 15 working days for conducting an investigation and submitting a final report on each investigation case.
Constitutional complaints
The first report includes Constitutional Complaint 300made congresswoman Patricia Chirinos (Avanza País) vs. Parliamentarians Raul Dorotheo, John Morey, George Flowers, Darwin Espinoza, Ilyich Lopez D Elvis Vergaraall off the action bench Popular.
Parliamentarians are accused of allegedly violating Articles 38 and 39 of the Constitution. Political constitution of Peru. In addition, for the likely commission of the crimes of simple and aggravated conspiracy, unlawful passive bribery, criminal organization and trading in influence. Within this framework, they are asked to be fired and deprived of the right to hold public office for ten years.
The complaint received 29 votes in favour, zero votes against and zero abstentions.
The second qualifying report was Constitutional Complaint 245articulated by former Attorney of the Nation Zoraida Avalos Rivera v. Caesar Chinostrosa PariahI, in his capacity as a former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, as an alleged perpetrator of the crimes of illegal sponsorship and specific active bribery to the detriment of the Peruvian state.
Consequently, the complaint received 30 votes in favour, zero votes against and zero abstentions.
Third, the qualifying report of the accumulated constitutional denunciations of 284 and 286, formulated against Congressman Freddy Diaz Monago, was only approved in one extreme.
Constitutional Complaint 284 for an alleged violation of Articles 38 and 39 of the Political Constitution of Peru; and unacceptable to the extreme degree of probable commission of crimes of rape and rape of persons who are in an unconscious state or when it is impossible to resist, and it is recommended to fix this extreme.
Similarly, Constitutional Complaint 286 was declared admissible for alleged violations of sections 39, 1 and 2 (numbers 1 and 24) (lit. h) of the Constitution Law. Political constitution of Peru. He received 30 votes in favour, zero votes against and zero abstentions.
Filed Complaints
As the final item on the agenda, the Permanent Commission approved by a majority vote the submission of constitutional complaint 107 (previously 460) formulated by the former Supreme Prosecutor. Luis Arce Cordovaagainst the President of the National Electoral Jury, Jorge Salas Arenas, and former Attorney of the Nation, Zoraida Avalos Rivera.
The complaint concerned the alleged violation of articles 3, 176, 178 (number 3), 179 and 180 of the Political Constitution of Peru, as well as the alleged commission of the crimes of abuse of power and usurpation of office typical of articles 376 and 361 of the Criminal Code respectively.
Owner Subcommittee on Constitutional ChargesLady Camones (APP) supported the report and said that Jorge Salas Arenas did not have the prerogative of impeachment as he was not included in Article 99 of the Constitution, and regarding the alleged crimes committed, he stated that “there is no warning that the exposed facts have been configured as such”.
In addition, he stated that “there is no evidence that the former prosecutor of the country, Soraida Avalos Rivera, violated the articles of the Constitution” and would not be held accountable for the above-mentioned crimes.
(According to Andina and Congress)
Source: RPP
I’m Liza Grey, an experienced news writer and author at the Buna Times. I specialize in writing about economic issues, with a focus on uncovering stories that have a positive impact on society. With over seven years of experience in the news industry, I am highly knowledgeable about current events and the ways in which they affect our daily lives.