Pedro Castillo lawyer: Investigation will determine if alleged trip with Fray Vazquez is ‘a lie or not’

Lawyer Benji Espinozaprotector of the president Peter’s castlereiterated that the head of state denied – even to himself – a proposed trip to Chiclayo on a presidential plane with his nephew Brother Vasquez – a fugitive from justice – last June.

“The president denies taking his nephew on the presidential plane. President denies flying presidential jet with his nephew Brother Vasquez. Besides, I don’t know. It is important that, on the one hand, the prosecutor’s office investigates, and on the other hand, Congress, which will request information from the Minister of Defense and be able to clarify it,” he said.

In an interview with RPP Noticias, a lawyer Peter’s castle He pointed out that the prosecutor’s office, as part of the investigation, should identify the person who prepared the document, which mentions the presence of a certain “lei Vasquez Castillo” on the presidential plane. He added that this person should clarify this case and explain the details of this document.

“I didn’t go into details like the reason for the trip. The question was very specific to the president, and his answer was also in these terms: Did your nephew Fray Vasquez travel with you? (he asked). No, Doctor (He answered). This is what I can convey to you. I don’t know the details, but if this is a trip where people appear, they will be called to testify,” he repeated.

“I think it’s healthy that the prosecutor’s office is collecting information (…) I’m not talking about assumptions, I’m talking about facts: specifically, I asked the president if he went with his nephew, how he gets lost, and he told me no. “Specifically. The fact that it slips, false or not, it will be established by the investigation,” he added.

Possible constitutional conviction of Pedro Castillo

Elsewhere an interview with a lawyer Benji Espinoza criticized the possibility that the national prosecutor, Patricia Benavidez, file a constitutional complaint against the president Peter’s castle and that he even proposes to Congress the option of not applying Article 117 of the Constitution, according to journalist Ricardo Useda.

“It would be criminal and would be a violation of the Constitution. Criminal because it would be a direct move against the road, ignoring what the referee (Juan Carlos) Checkley had already demarcated. The judge said that they could not file a constitutional complaint against the President, he could not be charged or investigated, and the prosecutor’s office did not appeal against this criterion, ”he objected.

Remembering that this criterion Power of attorney was “agreed” with the prosecutor’s office, the head of state’s lawyer clarified that the head public servicePatricia Benavidez, cannot ignore what Judge Juan Carlos Chekli has dictated and file a constitutional complaint with Parliament.

“I would challenge the judgment. It would be an act that would define the limits of disobedience or resistance to the authorities and, on the other hand, would define a violation of the Constitution,” he said after being questioned that bringing a constitutional charge before Congress would imply an “invitation” to the Legislature “to violate the Constitution.”

OUR PODCASTS

I understand this reference

EER+ 17 Let’s continue talking about BETTER CALL SAUL because he’s already surpassed Breaking Bad.

We talked about the first three episodes of the second part of the last season of the spin-off, which surpassed the series that gave birth to it (and we say this in all letters). The closure of every character, artistic licenses, what could be better… Diego and Renato are practically thankful to Vince Gilligan and Peter Gould for being there. You go and listen.