HomePoliticsThe Congress of the...

The Congress of the Republic rescinded the Supreme Decree changing the statute of Master Spill.

Ehaise pointed out that the Magister Spill was created as a private legal entity, that is, “it cannot be regulated, changed or interfered with by the laws of the Republic or norms of an extralegal rank.” | Font: Andean

adUnits.push({
code: ‘Rpp_politica_congreso_Nota_Interna1’,
mediaTypes: {
banner: {
sizes: (navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i)) ? [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100]] : [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100], [635, 90]]
}
},
bids: [{
bidder: ‘appnexus’,
params: {
placementId: ‘14149971’
}
},{
bidder: ‘rubicon’,
params: {
accountId: ‘19264’,
siteId: ‘314342’,
zoneId: ‘1604128’
}
},{
bidder: ‘amx’,
params: {
tagId: ‘MTUybWVkaWEuY29t’
}
},{
bidder: ‘oftmedia’,
params: {
placementId: navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i) ? ‘22617692’: ‘22617693’
}
}]
});

Full Congress approved – at the first vote and by a majority (65 votes in favor, 46 votes against and 5 abstentions) – a bill repealing Supreme Decree 009-2022-MINEDUwhich amends the bylaws Arbitration Spill approved Supreme Decree 021-88-EDwhich changes the governing and supervisory bodies of said institution.

The president Education Commission, Gladys Echaisepointed out that the norm that illegally changed the charter was canceled Arbitration Spilla device that can only be modified in accordance with a procedure laid down in its own regulatory text.

“Another interpretation,” he pointed out, “would mean confirming that the state can interfere in the activities of any subject of private law and change the rules for its activities provided for in article 76 of the Law on Civil Code”.

echoes added that Arbitration Spill It was created as a private legal entity, that is, “shall not be regulated, modified, or interfered with by the laws of the Republic or by ordinances of an unlawful rank.”

What happened at the plenary session?

Earlier, with 59 against, 43 in favour, and 4 abstentions, the plenary session of Congress rejected the previous question, so the bill goes back for consideration. Education Commission.

During the debate, deputies from Arbitration block and others doubted that the bill did not pass the committee and that there were no exceptions to this procedure.

Alex Paredes Gonzalez (BMCN) pointed out that article 31 of the rules was violated by bringing this draft up for discussion, as many congressmen withdrew their signatures; and highlighted the fact that Minedu cannot change the law.

Moreover, the legislator of the same assembly, Cathy Ugarte MamanI raised the preliminary issue of submitting the bill to the Education Commission for study and evaluation, a request that was rejected, and a reconsideration of the vote, which was requested a few minutes later.

In addition, MP Ruth Luque Ibarra (CD-JP) raised the issue that article 31 A, paragraph 2, of the regulation would not be respected. However, with 59 against, 43 in favour, and 4 abstentions, the plenary session of Congress rejected the previous question, so the bill is returned for consideration. Education Commission.

Minedu Pose

From Ministry of Education (Minedu) They warned on August 28 that the Plenum proposed to abolish, through a draft, Supreme Decree 009-2022-MINEDU, through which the Statute of the Magistracy was amended.

In a statement about his “weirdness and uneasiness since said project had not previously been considered by the Congressional Committee on Education”.

In addition, it ratifies that Minedu “has every right to change said Statute as specified in Article 3 of Supreme Decree 021-88-ED, which was ratified by the Constitutional Court in the judgment rendered in file 9231-2005-PA. /TK dated 28.08.2006″.

“Therefore, we respectfully ask the Congress of the Republic to discuss the aforementioned draft in the Education Commission so that public opinion can learn and weigh the arguments justifying the issuance of Supreme Decree 009-2022-MINEDU, which does not violate any constitutional or legal norm,” the document says.

Source: RPP

- A word from our sponsors -

Most Popular

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

More from Author

- A word from our sponsors -

Read Now