adUnits.push({
code: ‘Rpp_politica_gobierno_Nota_Interna1’,
mediaTypes: {
banner: {
sizes: (navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i)) ? [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100]] : [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100], [635, 90]]
}
},
bids: [{
bidder: ‘appnexus’,
params: {
placementId: ‘14149971’
}
},{
bidder: ‘rubicon’,
params: {
accountId: ‘19264’,
siteId: ‘314342’,
zoneId: ‘1604128’
}
},{
bidder: ‘amx’,
params: {
tagId: ‘MTUybWVkaWEuY29t’
}
},{
bidder: ‘oftmedia’,
params: {
placementId: navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i) ? ‘22617692’: ‘22617693’
}
}]
});
Lawyer Benji Espinozalegal defense of the president Peter’s castleassured that his sponsor chose to remain silent during the interrogation he was subjected to by the national prosecutor, Patricia Benavidezas part of the investigation that follows him in connection with his alleged interference in the process of promotion of officers of the Armed Forces and the National Police.
At a press conference, he said that in this morning’s meeting, the president limited himself to a response to the general law and a “voluntary statement” in which he denied the allegations.
“According to the provisions Code of Criminal Procedure, preliminary instructions have been made. The president responded to the general law; and those under investigation, the president and anyone in Peru, have the right to make a voluntary declaration, known as a voluntary declaration,” Espinosa said.
“In this regard, the president denied the accusations, confirmed his innocence and later indicated that later, when he was called, he would testify; but that for the moment he is going to exercise his constitutional, legal and customary right to remain silent. It was a process of this diligence,” he added.
When asked about the reasons for Peter’s castle remain silent, the lawyer indicated that the defense preferred to wait prosecution to have “all the information” on the cases in which the head of state is being investigated, in order to respond to everything, not in parts.
“As part of the dynamics of the investigation, operational-search activities are carried out daily. Procedures are carried out in four folders. It is better for the president to answer for everything than for a part, ”said the defender.
“It will be better later, when all the information is collected, for the president to give the appropriate explanations. It is your right, but above all it is useful for finding out the facts to answer everything when you already have all the information to answer in parts, ”he added.
Benji Espinoza He said that the president would ask for a postponement of his next speeches due to agenda items.
Pedro Castillo to the prosecutor’s office
On another occasion, the lawyer pointed out that the president decided to go to the headquarters of the public ministry to fulfill the summons of the attorney general, despite the fact that, according to him, he has the right to choose the place where the application is taken in his status as head of state.
“The President, as a high-ranking person of the Republic, has the right to choose the place of his speech and, having the right to choose, he chose the place. This does not mean that we recognize that the prosecutor’s office is right when it says that the president must go,” he said.
Recall that this morning the President left the Government Palace, accompanied by his lawyers. Edward Pachas D Benji Espinozaand walked about 500 meters that separate it from the headquarters Public service.
The head of state stayed at the prosecutor’s office for about an hour, after which he left the place and also returned to the Palace on foot.
During the inspection, clashes were recorded between sympathizers and opponents of the authorities, for which National Police he had to intervene to separate them and maintain order in the area.
OUR PODCASTS:
– Espacio Vital: how are football and coronavirus similar? Dr. Elmer Huerta says:
Source: RPP
I’m Liza Grey, an experienced news writer and author at the Buna Times. I specialize in writing about economic issues, with a focus on uncovering stories that have a positive impact on society. With over seven years of experience in the news industry, I am highly knowledgeable about current events and the ways in which they affect our daily lives.