Zamir Villaverde will not appear at the summons to the prosecutor’s office on Tuesday

Detainee Zamir Villaverde will not be present this Tuesday, July 19, at prosecutor’s office to testify as a witness in the preliminary investigation against President Pedro Castillo for alleged interference by his government in the 2021 promotion process for military and national police officers.

With the help of a summary presented by his defenseRPP was able to find out that villaverdewho several years ago was sentenced to four years in prison for the crimes of conspiracy and use of forged documents to the detriment of the National Institute of Natural Resources (Inrena), specified that only this Monday he was notified of the mentioned subpoena to testify. in this case.

In the same document Zamir Villaverde asks the Attorney General Patricia Benavidezso that this zeal can be carried over to the future.

Last week, the suspect was released from Ancona prison after serving several months in preventive detention in the Puente Tarata III case.

A few days ago, the head of the public ministry decided that President Pedro Castillo should make his preliminary statement on August 4 as part of this preliminary investigation, which was launched in connection with the alleged crimes of a criminal organization and trading in influence to the detriment of the state.

Who Zamir Villaverde

researched Zamir Villaverde He was expelled from the Peruvian Air Force (FAP) for committing criminal acts along with other non-commissioned officers in his spare time.

And not only that, according to Republic, in 2007 he was imprisoned for participating in the shooting of a pizzeria in the Miraflores district of Lima with a gang of criminals. For this, in 2009 he was sentenced to 10 years in prison for aggravated robbery.

Villaverde: “Pedro Castillo is the leader of a criminal organization”

Detainee Zamir Villaverde was interviewed by the RPP and denied benefiting from any illegal activities associated with President Pedro Castillo; however, he claimed to have witnessed events that supported prosecutor Carla Zechenarro’s thesis that the head of state “is the leader of a criminal organization along with his family and closest associates.”

“I am not saying that all this was legal (the Puente Tarata case). The company that won did not receive money from the state, did not give bribes, but as part of the investigation of the Tarata case, there were illegal, illegal actions. case, because it was thanks to these illegal actions that information was provided so that he could start (investigation) against the president,” Villaverde said.

On the other hand, he admitted that he made a mistake by contacting Juan Silva and Bruno Pacheco, who are fugitives.

“If I made a mistake, I accept it, since I was connected with these people: Mr. Bruno Pacheco, Juan Silva (former minister on the run), nephews and many other people who will be the result of an investigation into the State Ministry. The information I provided in the Puente Tarata case corresponds to the benefit awarded to me, but for the good of the country (…),” he added.