Washington – Last year, Senator Mitt Romney (R -Utah) challenged the appointment of President Joe Biden of Brown Jackson to the DC Federal Court of Appeals.
On Monday, the Utah Republican backed Jackson’s appointment to the Supreme Court, a rare change in a deeply divided Senate where a bad fight quickly became the norm in the state’s highest court.
“While I voted for his earlier statement, I doubted he was in the mainstream,” Romney said. He told reporters Tuesday. “And that I spent time with him personally and reviewed his testimony before Congress [I] He is convinced that he is in the mainstream ”.
In announcing Jackson’s support, which was somewhat surprising, Romney called the judge a “well-qualified lawyer” and an “honorary person,” though he said they may differ on ideological grounds.
For Romney and two other Republicans who support Jackson – Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska – Jackson’s nomination is an opportunity to cut down on some of the cut rhetoric driving the Supreme Court’s approval and return the public’s confidence in the ‘institution.
“Now we follow a different standard than we did 20 years ago, when people were judged only based on their qualifications, and now we’re trying to define some other issues,” Romney said Tuesday, describing the Senate approval process.
Republicans have filed vicious and fraudulent lawsuits against Jackson for a fairly consistent series of penalties on sex offenders, cherry picking cases, and similar convictions handed down by Republicans who appointed by the judge. GOP senators who support Jackson are also there Tired Like some propedophile on the right.
Murkovsky, Collins and Romney are propedophiles.
They can only vote #KBJ.
– representative. Marjorie Taylor Green (@RepMTG) April 5, 2022
The fear is growing that the president will never approve a candidate in the Supreme Court if their party does not control the Senate. Republicans shamefully denied President Barack Obama the chance to sit on the Supreme Court in 2016 and they even refused to listen to his candidate, Merrick Garland. Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) Will have no accountability at the Supreme Court confirmation hearing in 2023, the third year of Biden’s presidency, if the GOP regains control of the House.
“Okay, we’ll have to wait and see what happens,” McConnell said last year.
Meanwhile, Senator Lindsey Graham (RSC) was clearer on the issue and suggested Monday that Republicans would not hold hearings on Jackson’s candidacy if they were to review the Senate.
“If we are accountable, it is not before this committee. “You’re going to have someone more modest than that,” Graham said.
Graham confirmed Jackson’s current position in the U.S. District Court of Appeals in Columbia last year. But in the opposite stage of the novel, Graham opposes Jackson’s appointment to the Supreme Court – the first time he has fought in a Supreme Court election since entering the Senate in 2003.
“Now that you’re talking about the Supreme Court, you’re chasing politics, not just relating to it,” Graham said Monday, explaining his opposition to Jackson.
Source: Huffpost
