The Supreme Court is ready to strike Ro Wade – A historic decision coding Americans ’access to abortion, according to a leaked draft of majority opinion published Monday by Politico.
“Rowe was wrong in the beginning,” Alito wrote in the document, Politico reports. “We believe that Ro and Casey should be abolished. It is time to focus on the constitution and return the issue of abortion to the elected representatives of the people ”.
The judiciary went on to say that the abortion issue has remained a divisive political issue for decades, adding that the court can “just do our job, which is to interpret the law. … and resolve the issue accordingly. “
“Rowe clearly failed to end the abortion division,” he wrote. On the contrary, the roe deer ‘burned’ the national question, which has been divided over the last half century. “The inability of this court to conclude the debate on this issue should not come as a surprise.”
The court’s official decision on this issue will be final only after it is published and the judges may change the votes earlier, which means nothing has been decided.
Patricia McCabe, the court’s public information officer, said the Supreme Court had not “commented” on the leak.
Roe’s repeal decision would eliminate access to abortion in most of the country. More than 20 states have laws or constitutional changes. Prohibit abortion as soon as possible, if Roe v. Wade turned around.
Explain: This is a draft conclusion. It’s scandalous, it hasn’t been done yet, but it’s uncertain.
You have the right to abortion and it is still legal. https://t.co/s9R7w99n71– Planned Parenting (@PPFA) May 3, 2022
It is very rare for the release of drafts of the decision of the Court of Cassation prior to their publication.
“Politico’s editors sent a letter to the staff shortly after the letter was published saying it had been carried out.”Extensive review processWhich led them to believe the design was real.
“This unprecedented perspective on the judiciary is clearly a new thing of great public interest,” wrote executive editor Daphne Lincer and chief editor Matt Kaminski. “Our obligation, as protected by the First Amendment, is to report on the news and inform our public.”
“SCOTUSblog, which is closely monitoring the Supreme Court, said it was a draft document.”Almost certainly It is real, ”but it does not reflect the comments or opinions of other judges. The site added that the leak would cause an “earthquake” inside the court.
“It is impossible to magnify the quake that will follow within the court, in terms of the breach of trust between judges and staff,” the site wrote on Twitter. “Leaking this news is the heaviest and unforgivable sin”.
Dobbs v. The Jackson Women’s Health Organization’s case, which currently threatens Ross, is based on the Mississippi Act of 2018, which prohibits abortion for 15 weeks. The law, which came before the Supreme Court in December, is the direct opposite of Roe, which established a constitutional right to abortion before the fetus can live for about 24 weeks. Mississippi law reduces the gestational age by nearly half.
There are several possible consequences to the case. The Supreme Court can repeal the law, which means the roe will remain intact. But lawyers and experts agreed after oral discussions in December that the Conservative majority in court indicated that they would likely follow the law by directly banning abortion or changing the line of feasibility.
Each of these options would effectively eliminate Ross, initiating a national struggle in which some states justify abortion while others are doing everything in their power to protect it.
The report has sparked outrage among abortion rights groups, with some saying the court had time to change course after the leak.
“We all have pointless designs. “They have a chance to fix this,” Rene Brace Sherman, founder and CEO of We Testify, an abortion fiction organization, told HuffPost.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi issued a statement after the accusation accusing some Parliament -appointed Supreme Court justices of lying about their views against Ro Wade.
“The vote of the judges appointed by the Republicans to overthrow Roe Wade would be outrageous, one of the worst and most damaging decisions in modern history,” Sumer and Pelosi said in a statement. “Some of these conservative judges, who are somehow irresponsible to the American people, have deceived the United States Senate, broken the Constitution and broken both the precedent and the reputation of the Supreme Court, all at the cost of twelve- dozen million women. “They may soon be deprived of the autonomy of their bodies and the constitutional rights they have trusted for half a century.”
Source: Huffpost