HomeWorldDictator's dead end. ...

Dictator’s dead end. Putin is running out of options in Ukraine

As Putin’s troubles at home and abroad mount, so far there are no signs that he is ready to capitulate and seek peace.

Vladimir Putin says the war he unleashed on Ukraine is going according to plan, and that the temporarily occupied territories are forever part of Russia. Now, while Putin’s army is fleeing from Kherson, he himself is silent and refuses to visit the G20 summit in Indonesia. The Russian dictator is running out of options for Ukraine, writes Bloomberg.

Associations with losses

Journalists noted the fact that Putin was not present when his Shoigu and Surovikin announced the withdrawal of troops from Kherson. This is because “the Kremlin is not eager to associate the dictator with defeats that contradict his claim to annex Kherson and three other Ukrainian territories forever.”

Also, the risk that Putin will face harsh criticism at the G20 summit for his invasion of Ukraine “is greater than any potential benefit from participation.”

Bloomberg reports that in doing so, Putin is not counting on support from Chinese leader Xi Jinping or Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

“Both sent signals of discontent last week: Xi warned against any use of nuclear weapons, and India’s foreign minister made it clear in Moscow that developing countries are in “grave pain” because of the conflict is fueling food and energy insecurity.” , – said in the material.

Bloomberg writes that as Putin’s troubles at home and abroad mount, so far there are no signs that he is ready to capitulate and seek peace.

“His wiggle room is still shrinking,” the article said.

call to kill

One of the main ideologists of the “Russian world,” Alexander Dugin, after the withdrawal of Russian troops from Kherson, wrote a post that actually called for the assassination of Putin.

He put the responsibility on the Russian authorities for the fact that “the Russian city, the capital of one of the Russian regions (Kherson) was surrendered.”

Dugin burst into a series of significant rhetorical questions regarding the role of the government in the Russian Federation and its possible retaliation for miscalculations, literally writing the following: “Power. He was responsible for this (retreat from Kherson). What is the definition of autocracy, and do we have it? We give the leader the absolute totality of power, and he saves us all – the people, the state, the people – at a critical moment. If for this he surrounds himself with evil spirits or spits on social justice, it is unpleasant, but if he only saves. What if it doesn’t save? Then – the fate of the “rain king” awaits him (see Fraser). Autocracy also has its downside. The completeness of power in case of success, but also the completeness of responsibility for failure. How do you like it?”

James Fraser is a British religious scholar, anthropologist, ethnologist, cultural scientist, folklorist and historian of religion. In his book The Golden Bough, he describes the African cult of the King of the Rains, a priest who is said to have the ability to bring rain: “People bring him tribute of clothes and fruits and cultivate the his large field for him. He is the king of kings, and his office is passed on to the son of his brother or sister. It is believed that through a spell he brings rain and drives away locusts. If it does not live up to people’s expectations and a prolonged drought occurs in the country, he was stoned to death; and his nearest relative shall cast the first stone at him.”

Retreat of Putinism

Russian historian Andrei Zubkov called the retreat of the Russians from Kherson the retreat of Putinism.

“It remains to wait for political changes in Russia itself in the near future. The collapse of the front and confusion in the rear. It was already done in 1917, 105 years ago. But then Russia’s position in the world was more great – strong allies, a really strong army. But the confidence of the people in power is gone – and everything is rolling … Now there are no allies except Iran and North Korea, no powerful army. It’s like everything . As if you can bluff, but you can’t win, which is what the whole world is now convinced of. The question is what will fall now – Putinism or Russia. I want everything to be limited to Putinism, but the future is unpredictable, and our aspirations cost little,” the historian notes.

Source: korrespondent

- A word from our sponsors -

Most Popular

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

More from Author

- A word from our sponsors -

Read Now