The head of the pentagon is described in detail the start of the operation and the first blow. A few minutes after the first objective strike, Waltz provided additional information about the damage caused and the consequences for the leaders of the Husites.
The Atlantic published a new part of messages from the scandal chat by leading US officials to the signal messenger, which was a response to the Trump administration’s refusal to publish secret materials. About this writes Atlantic on Wednesday, March 26th.
The Security Secretary of the Pit Hegset and National Security Advisor Mike Waltz was under pressure and called on the resignation after recognizing that the editor -in -Chief of the Atlantic Jeffrey Goldberg was accidentally falling into the private chat of high official officials. In this chat, future wind strikes were discussed in Yemeni Husites.
After the first Goldberg publication, Hegset said “no military plans were sent,” and National Intelligence director Tulsey Gabbard assured that there were no “general secret materials” in the messages.
However, the new screenshots of the letter published by the Atlantic indicate that the hegset provided information in detail about the time and conclusion of the future US attack on Husites in Yemen. In its original material, Goldberg only in general output has set the content of the letter out of fear that the publication may damage the security of US military personnel.
After representatives of the Trump administration began to refuse the secret of the information sent to signal, the Atlantic decided to publish clarification.
In the new publication, Goldberg and Shane Harris wrote: “Statements sound from the mouth of hegset, Gabbard, Retcliffe and Trump, saying that we are lying about the content of the texts, we are convinced next, especially, to draw our own conclusions, we should see these texts. Channels.
The new article provides screenshots, in which hegset in detail the start of the operation and the first blow. A few minutes after the first strike of the strike, Waltz provided additional information about the damage caused and possible consequences for the leaders of the Husites.
Atlantic journalists emphasize that experts have repeatedly warned the risk of using signal chat for sensitive discussions, as it may threaten national security.
“If the moved is in the hands of a man who is angry with American interests, the consequences for American pilots can be a catastrophe,” warned the sets.
As you know, the Editor -in -Chief of the American Publication that Atlantic, Jeffrey Goldberg, said he accidentally added to the closed chat of American officials at the signal, discussed plans for Yemen’s strikes. However, after criticism, the American president assured that for his advisor, “it would be a lesson,” and also added that Waltz “in the essence of a good man.”
News from CORRESPONDENT.NET On the telegram and whatsapp. Subscribe to our channels https://t.me/KorresPondentNet and WhatsApp
Source: korrespondent
I am David Wyatt, a professional writer and journalist for Buna Times. I specialize in the world section of news coverage, where I bring to light stories and issues that affect us globally. As a graduate of Journalism, I have always had the passion to spread knowledge through writing.