The likely “Earth for Peace” scenario will fail at every step, according to an authoritative American publication.
US presidential candidate Donald Trump, if he wins, allegedly plans to implement the “Earth for Peace” scenario in Ukraine. And while the Republican leader may find this plan realistic and attractive, he will fail every step of the way. This was stated in an article by the American publication The Hill.
“Who could be against the Land for Peace agreement in Ukraine? Imagine: Ukrainians give up some land, Russians agree to peace, and everyone lives happily ever after. No wonder the former President said Donald Trump that he can do it in 24 hours. (. ..) So what is wrong with this scheme Almost everything, “said the publication.
As the media wrote, citing Trump’s entourage, he is likely to blackmail Ukraine by stopping American aid to bring it to the negotiating table. But Kyiv also receives significant military aid from European partners and can survive on it, The Hill notes.
The same insiders said that Trump also wants to force Russia to participate in negotiations through blackmail – threats that, in return, they will increase arms supplies to Ukraine. However, Trump himself has created a reputation for himself that Moscow does not believe in his willingness to help Ukraine at the expense of Russia and will perceive threats as an empty bluff.
But even if each side agrees to negotiate so as not to look like a warmonger compared to the enemy, this does not guarantee the effectiveness of these negotiations.
“The “land for peace” discussion is beginning. Both sides will ask: “How much of which land for which world?” There is no easy answer to this question. The only thing we can say with certainty is that the Ukrainians want to give up as little land as possible for as much peace as possible, while Russians want to keep as much land as possible for as little peace as possible. There is probably some theoretical middle ground land, and the Ukrainians could be persuaded to accept it. The Russians would cross their arms and say “no,” The Hill wrote.
According to the author of the publication, any external force, or an arbitrator, can reach an agreement between the two sides at its discretion. Russia will not agree to let NATO be this arbiter, Ukraine will not agree through China. It’s fun to talk about the UN or, for example, Hungary.
The only viable option to end this war is to side with one of the two warring states, the author of the publication believes. And he added that a victory for Ukraine would be “obviously better” for a whole range of reasons that everyone knows.
“Faced with these alternatives, what will Trump choose? The future of the world may matter to him, but to him [вера в собственную] genius is more important. Fortunately, both options are being pushed [Трампа] to victory for Ukraine, because defeating another self-proclaimed genius of the world, Vladimir Putin, is more than Trump’s ego can bear,” the article’s author summarized.
Let’s remember that in the debate with Joe Biden, Trump again said that he will stop the war between Russia and Ukraine if he is elected.
Italy says Trump has no fair solution for Ukraine.
New Correspondent.net on Telegram and WhatsApp. Subscribe to our channels Athletistic and WhatsApp
Source: korrespondent
I am David Wyatt, a professional writer and journalist for Buna Times. I specialize in the world section of news coverage, where I bring to light stories and issues that affect us globally. As a graduate of Journalism, I have always had the passion to spread knowledge through writing.