You can press the Russian Federation. Cameron intimidated the Kremlin

London does not object to the use of British weapons in Ukraine to strike Russia.

British Foreign Secretary David Cameron not only managed to visit Kiev and plant a tree in Lvov, but also pledged $3.74 billion in annual military aid to Ukraine “as long as necessary” his other statement became more resonant – London did not object.” the use of British weapons for the attack on Russia.

It is up to Ukraine to decide

Cameron said Ukraine had the right to use weapons supplied by London to strike targets inside Russia, and it was up to Kyiv to decide whether to do so.

“Ukraine has a right. Russia is invading Ukrainian territory, and Ukraine understandably feels the need to ensure its defense… Ukraine is fiercely defending itself against a criminal Russian invasion, and a war that Putin thinks will take several day has dragged on for years. But this war is a challenge for our entire generation, and Ukraine must not fight it alone,” the British government’s press service quoted Cameron as saying.

This is the first public acknowledgment of Ukraine’s right to use British weapons in a deep-seated attack on Russia by a senior UK official.

Reaction of the Russian Federation

Russian dictator Vladimir Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov called Cameron’s remarks dangerous.

Traditionally, Peskov accused the West of “a direct escalation of tension around the Ukrainian conflict (as Russia calls the war it launched against Ukraine)” and “warned” about a “threat to European security .”

“Here we see a dangerous trend of escalating tensions in the official statement,” he said.

And the representative of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Maria Zakharova, said that the aggressor country warned the United States, Britain and the European Union that any “aggressive action against Crimea” “will receive a blow of revenge.”

“I want to once again warn Washington, London, Brussels that any aggressive action against Crimea will not only be doomed to failure, but will also receive a crushing blow of revenge,” Zakharova said at the briefing.

There will be punches

The previous day, the permanent representative of Ukraine to the UN, Sergei Kislitsa, hinted at the destruction of the Crimean bridge in 2024.

The diplomat published a picture listing the main types of bridges, in particular: Arch, Cantilever, Cable-stayed, Suspension, Linked Arch and Kerch.

At the same time, Kerch bridges, unlike others, are not depicted schematically – there is nothing under them.

The Commander of the Ukrainian Naval Forces, Vice Admiral Alexey Neizhpapa, is convinced that the Crimean Bridge will be destroyed by the end of 2024. Also, according to him, the Ukrainian Armed Forces know how to destroy it. “I think we won’t have to wait long. At least this year for sure,” he said about the destruction of the illegal structures of the Russians.

I didn’t just say that

“Without a doubt, Cameron’s statement, I emphasize – not only the British Foreign Secretary, but also the former Prime Minister, a very famous and respected person in the Western world, the statement is very important that this, among other things, showed that there are some disagreements and internal discussions between our Western allies,” said Ukrainian political scientist Vladimir Fesenko.

The expert recalled, in the context of Cameron’s words, the statement of French President Emmanuel Macron about the introduction of Western troops in Ukraine.

“Therefore, I think this is a very important statement, which indicates that Biden’s position is not universal and does not reflect the position of all our international partners, when there is a delay in American aid, it is the Europeans – Germany, the Netherlands and both Great Britain partially closed this loophole by providing additional aid packages. than Washington, and the position expressed by Mr. Cameron is another confirmation of this,” concluded Fesenko.