Open data, as well as Ukrainian and even Russian sources, indicate that Sergei Shoigu’s statement about the expulsion of the Ukrainian Armed Forces from the village of Krynki on the left bank of the Kherson region is not true.
Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu bravely reported on the alleged capture of Krynoki, Kherson region, a bridgehead of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the left bank of the Dnieper. However, Ukrainian or even Russian sources did not confirm this information.
The Ukrainian Armed Forces captured a bridge on the left bank of the Dnieper near the village of Krynki in the fall of 2023. Despite the difficulty of providing the advanced Ukrainian group and the significant number of Russian ground forces operating against it , it is not possible to remove the landing force from the left bank.
No one believed in Shoigu
“The covers have been cleaned. Russian troops took positions along almost the entire shore of the Dnieper. We control the banks of the Krynka and Konka rivers,” Shoigu reported in a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Shoigu’s statement about the destruction of the Ukrainian bridgehead on the left bank of the Dnieper was met with disbelief even by Russian Z-bloggers. So, the following message appeared on the Russian telegram channel Military Informant: “Currently, sources from the field do not confirm this fact; the enemy still retains control over part of the remains of the settlement. And besides, the statement that Krynki had been cleared, and the simultaneous statement that the enemy remained sitting in the basements, simply contradicted each other. Why it was necessary to run ahead of the locomotive at such a high level is a mystery. Apparently, some people decided that, because of the dizziness from the victories in Avdiivka, no one would notice.”
“The Kremlin likely announced the acquisition of Krynok early to enhance the desired information effect before the presidential election in March 2024, although the Kremlin is likely setting expectations that the Russian military may not meet,” said American Institute of War (ISW) analysis. .
Propaganda before the election
OK South press secretary Natalya Gumenyuk said that the Ukrainian Armed Forces continue to gradually expand the territory of the bridgehead. He also called Russia’s attempts to remove the Ukrainian bridgehead a desire to achieve an information effect before the presidential election.
The geolocated video, released on February 19, shows Ukrainian forces conducting a HIMARS strike on a Russian Zala mobile drone launcher near Staraya Mayachka.
ISW predicts that the Russian authorities can now claim “victories” on the Ukrainian battlefield before they are achieved at the tactical or operational level, in order to simultaneously glorify Putin and demoralize Ukraine. At the same time, such rhetoric may create unjustified expectations in Russia’s information space, the Institute for the Study of War says.
Source: korrespondent
I am David Wyatt, a professional writer and journalist for Buna Times. I specialize in the world section of news coverage, where I bring to light stories and issues that affect us globally. As a graduate of Journalism, I have always had the passion to spread knowledge through writing.