Law has its tricks, and public liberties have their intangible principles. Taken together, the two guarantee the rule of law. And it is into these corridors and subtleties that the decision of the Council of State slips, which on Tuesday ratified the request of the Ministry of the Interior to remove Imam Ikiusen.
The Supreme Court, however, categorically rejected some of the appeals filed by Gerald Darmanin viz. “Strong hostility to the constitutive values of Western societies, encouraging its audience towards separatism.” touching words “contrasts between radical Islam and the enemies of Islam”. and: “Speech inciting violence and hatred, questioning the reality of attacks carried out by the terrorist organization ISIS, or showing sympathy for Osama bin Laden.”
For the sages of the Palais-Royal, these elements of the file are not compiled in accordance with Article 631-3 of the Code of Entry and Residence of Foreigners and the law…
Source: Le Figaro
