PJ orders congressman Freddy Diaz out of the country for 9 months after complaining of rape.

Power of attorney issued a 9-month travel ban on Congressman Freddie Diaz Monago, who is under investigation for rape.

This measure was determined by the Supreme Court of Investigation and imposed by Chief Justice Juan Carlos Chekli Soria upon request public service and the parliamentarian’s raid.

In this regard, Judge Chekli Soria ordered that an official letter be sent to National Directorate of Migration for compliance with the measure of personal coercion.

The prosecutor’s office commented on the decision

After decision Power of attorneyThe Ministry of Health issued a decision on the decision of the supreme judge regarding the congressman Freddie Diaz Monagosince it was requested 2nd Supreme Prosecutor for Criminal Cases.

As they explained, in addition to preventing the deputy from leaving Peruvian territory, they demanded his provisional arrest; however, this measure was found to be unreasonable Preparatory Court of Inquiry.

supreme prosecutor Zoraida Avalos filed a 60-day preliminary investigation against the congressman Freddie Diaz for the alleged crime against sexual freedom of rape of a person who is unconscious or unable to resist as a result of this case.

The matter will be reviewed by the Ethics Commission.

Meanwhile, the Congressional Ethics Committee unanimously approved last Tuesday the unanimous conviction of the parliamentarian Freddie Diaz Monago accused of raping a parliamentary worker in his legislature

16 congressmen voted to open an investigation into Diaz Monago, who was exposed last week by an alleged victim.

The decision of the Congress was welcomed by the Minister for Women, Diana Miloslavichwho had previously asked the Ethics Commission to take strong action in the event of a sexual assault complaint against Díaz Monago.

We believe that the applicant “could have been confused”, says the lawyer

Cathy Kachai, congressman’s attorney Freddie Diaz, pointed out that for the technical protection of a parliamentarian, the crime of rape of a parliamentary worker would not have been committed and that what happened in the legislator’s office would have been a concerted action. And this despite the version expressed the day before by the alleged victim.

In an interview with RPP Noticias, the lawyer noted that, together with another colleague, she decided to carry out a technical defense of the convicted parliamentarian, “considering that for us (as a defense) this crime would not have been committed, and it would have to, according to the congressman’s version of sexual relations by mutual agreement.

“We do not believe that she is lying, but that she could be confused because she never says that she was raped, she says she does not remember what happened. She could be confused, she drank, the congressman also drank. Both of them admit that there were drinks, and we are not talking about a bottle, ”said RPP Noticias’ lawyer.