adUnits.push({
code: ‘Rpp_politica_judiciales_Nota_Interna1’,
mediaTypes: {
banner: {
sizes: (navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i)) ? [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100]] : [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100], [635, 90]]
}
},
bids: [{
bidder: ‘appnexus’,
params: {
placementId: ‘14149971’
}
},{
bidder: ‘rubicon’,
params: {
accountId: ‘19264’,
siteId: ‘314342’,
zoneId: ‘1604128’
}
},{
bidder: ‘amx’,
params: {
tagId: ‘MTUybWVkaWEuY29t’
}
},{
bidder: ‘oftmedia’,
params: {
placementId: navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i) ? ‘22617692’: ‘22617693’
}
}]
});
Power of attorney decided to take into consideration the amparo lawsuit presented by President Pedro Castillo v. Congress in order to stop the processes that the legislature is carrying out regarding alleged acts of corruption in which, among other things, the government is implicated.
First Constitutional Chamber The Supreme Court, which accepted this complaint, announced that a single hearing on the case will be held on March 6, 2023 at 9 a.m. virtually. In addition, attorneys for each party may not exceed 5 minutes for their respective oral presentation.
Seeks to nullify processes
Application submitted by an agent through a lawyer Ananias Narro Kalkeseeks to annul the proceedings against him, which Congresssuch as the constitutional accusation of alleged betrayal of the Motherland, which is in Subcommittee on Constitutional Chargespresided over by Lady Camones.
Recall that the said subcommittee was supposed to evaluate the final report on the aforementioned complaint against the president last Monday. However, a change in its membership, led by a Standing Commission, prompted the session to move into a fourth adjournment, and there is still no fixed date for its resumption when the report will be put to a vote.
Another process that they are trying to stop is the third petition for a candidacy for the presidency due to permanent moral incapacity, which is in the process of collecting signatures. The mentioned movement is promoted by congressmen Edward Malaga, Carlos Anderson, Diego Bazan, Adriana Tudela D Karol Paredes.
In addition, the amparo’s appeal seeks to reverse the actions of the Supervisory Commission, chaired by Hector Ventura, concerning investigations against the president for allegedly leading a criminal organization.
At the end of the document, the President asks that “the Congress of the Republic be ordered to refrain from exercising political control in an arbitrary, disproportionate and unconstitutional manner against me and in my capacity as constitutional President of the Republic of Peru. . .
It should be noted that this amparo lawsuit was filed in October last year and was addressed to the constitutional judge Supreme Court of Lima. However, Lima’s First Specialized Constitutional Court rejected it on the grounds that it was not within its jurisdiction.
In addition, the appeal was criticized by Benji Espinoza, the president’s lawyer, who indicated that it was not part of his argument and speech.
“The President apologized to me for the inconsistency of actions. [Ananías] Narro is not a lawyer for the president, he managed to get the signature of the head of state, but this does not mean that he is part of the team. They took advantage of a difficult moment to present something that, from my legal point of view, this lawsuit is completely inconsistent, and I do not share any of the arguments made in this lawsuit, ”he said in the program. Everything is known from PTR.
Source: RPP
I’m Liza Grey, an experienced news writer and author at the Buna Times. I specialize in writing about economic issues, with a focus on uncovering stories that have a positive impact on society. With over seven years of experience in the news industry, I am highly knowledgeable about current events and the ways in which they affect our daily lives.