Marta Moyano: Confidence Request ‘Strengthens Executive’s Position Against Congress and Attorney’s Office’

congresswoman Martha Moyanomember of the People’s Bench Fuerza, doubted that the President of the Council of Ministers, Hannibal Torresinsist on filing a confidentiality request with Congress of the Republicdespite Parliament Speaker José Williams indicating that his request was “unacceptable”.

“This confirms what the Executive has been doing since day one, it just reinforces the position that the Executive must destroy the entire existing system, and furthermore, from day one the Executive has been talking about constituent Assembly and his followers are talking about it and that’s why today they organized a march calling for the shutdown of Congress”

“This strengthens the position of the executive in relation to the legislature, and now also in relation to the prosecutor’s office, throughout the democratic system. This is what he wants (to close the Congress) from the first day, because from that day on he did not want to meet in the palace, and then the Sarratea house became the Castillo office, where the characters now under investigation were arriving, ”he added.

In an interview with the RPP, the parliamentarian clarified that until now Hannibal Torres He did not raise the issue of confidence, as it is requested at the plenary session of the parliament. In accordance with this, the legislator considered that the head of the cabinet “made a mistake” by submitting the document “to tell Congress what it should do with the project.”

“This is an interference with the functions of Parliament: they cannot raise a question of confidence on a bill, they cannot raise a question of confidence on exclusive and exceptional matters of Parliament, then Mr.Hannibal Torres) insists on it, and we are certainly not going to accept such a question,” he said.

“We are not going to respond with another document. I tell Mr. Anibal Torres to take his time and read the document that we sent him. The person says what he wants, what can we expect from the prime minister?” he added.

Trust request is “not addressable”

Last Wednesday, the head of the Congress, José Williams Zapata, responded to a request sent by the Chairman of the Council of Ministers, Hannibal Torresthat Parliament discuss a draft executive branch that seeks to abolish the rule governing a matter of trust.

In a formal letter, the president of Congress recalls that, in accordance with the law that develops the issue of trust, and the Rules of Congress, any submission of this resource “must concern matters or matters of the competence of the executive branch.” and not with regard to the exclusive and exclusive powers of Congress.”

We also remind you that constitutional Courtsupreme interpreter of the Constitution, has already affirmed in its decision the constitutionality of Law 31355 (which develops the implementation of the issue of confidence) as a result of an unconstitutionality suit filed by the same executive power in October 2021,” he said.

Accordingly, the head of parliament indicates that it is “not necessary” for the executive branch to indicate that it would be appropriate to raise the issue of confidence in Congress to consider a bill aimed at repealing the law developing the exercise. credibility issue, because that would be contrary to what is established constitutional Court.

“The total rejection by the Board of Directors concerns that proposal, the purpose of which is the approval or non-approval of initiatives exclusive to Congress (…) In this order of ideas and subject to what is specified in Law 31355, which is part of the constitutionality block, his request is inadmissible given the conditions,” he said.

After a statement by the President of Congress, the owner Cabinet of Ministers He doubted that Parliament had declared “a question of confidence that does not exist” inadmissible, because this appeal was only announced, but not officially presented.

“This is in line with the fact that we receive the highest quality education. The President of the Congress or the Board of Directors may not know this issue, but they hire advisers, but why can these people engage in this barbarism? “Peru is subject to this, the dictatorship of ignorance,” he asked.

OUR PODCASTS

Today we are analyzing the electoral climate in Junin. What is the situation in the cradle of the Perulibrista project? Paulo Wilka of 50+1 and Ada Ramos of RPP tell us. (Excerpts from the report “Dynamics of the Center” and the Prosecutor’s Office, Jorge Jauregui, Cynthia Cienfuegos and Ober Villalva).