The Council of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office supports the decision to file a constitutional complaint against Pedro Castillo

The Council of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office supports the decision prosecutor’s officeled by Attorney Patricia Benavidez Vargas in filing a constitutional complaint against the President Peter’s castle and other high officials. In addition, they demanded a call for respect for autonomy public service according to their fiscal functions.

“Prosecutors at the national level act independently, autonomously and objectively, respecting due process and due process guarantees for persons under investigation; Therefore, we reject any action aimed at stopping and obstructing tax investigations,” the statement said.

In this regard, the board expressed its support prosecutor’s office by filing a constitutional complaint against the President Peter’s castle and other senior officials.

Similarly, he called for “unrestricted respect” for the “constitutional autonomy public serviceby all the authorities and constitutional bodies constituting the Peruvian State”.

constitutional denunciation

Recall that the State Attorney of the country, Patricia Benavidez, filed a constitutional complaint against President Pedro Castillo for alleged criminal organization crimes, aggravated influence peddling and conspiracy. The charge also includes former ministers Juan Silva Villegas and Gainer Alvarado López.

All reported persons are identified public service as alleged members of a criminal organization that would act against the state, led by the president himself.

In response, the legal defense of the President of the Republic, Pedro Castillo, filed a lawsuit. application for protection of rights who seeks said constitutional complaint formulated by the country’s prosecutor, Patricia Benavidez. The request was signed by Presidential Counsel Benji Espinoza and addressed to the Chief Justice of the Preliminary Inquiry. Supreme Court.

“Benji Gregory Espinosa Ramos, defense lawyer for President José Pedro Castillo Terrones, in an unconstitutional investigation against him for alleged and denied crimes of a criminal organization, aggravated influence peddling and conspiracy to the detriment of the state; to you, with due respect, we introduce ourselves and say: legal protectionspecific claim, admissibility and origin of the defense of rights before the infringement of the rights of my sponsor, preliminary aspects, grounds, colophon”, can be read in the document submitted by the lawyer.

With this in mind, this Tuesday, October 17, Congress submitted to the Constitutional Court (CC) an extension of the requirement in which it asks for an interpretation article 117 belonging Constitution.