Attorney General asks prosecutors to clarify why Cesar Inostroza does not have an indictment through Interpol

State Counsel for Corruption of Officials voiced her position on the process of extradition of the former judge and fugitive from justice Caesar Inostrosa, who, once in Spain, became a fugitive. This is after prosecution indicated that this institution “has stopped processing an active request for extradition without informing the relevant authorities Power of attorney D public service”.

In this sense, the aforementioned office clarified that through an attorney Xavier Pacheco, the first two extradition requests sent to the Spanish government were successful. As for the third, it is indicated that it was raised public service in front of him executive branch “without any coordination with the strategist” deployed on this issue.

For this reason, Pacheco’s lawyer “requested the Department of Justice not to direct the aforementioned extradition.” If that were to happen, “it is very likely that extradited Inostrosa would have extended his stay for another two years using his usual deferred resources,” the Attorney General’s Office said.

In this sense, the said department “categorically rejects the inaccurate and tendentious statement of the press service public servicein the sense that he attributes the unjustified delay in the extradition process of the extradited César Inostroza to the lawyer Javier Pacheco-Palacios”.

ask for clarification

advocate also ask that prosecution to explain why the former judge “find himself without any requisition on an international scale through International Police (Interpol) from August 19 to the present.

In this context, the organization confirms that it has been notified The international cooperation from public service “Then it is necessary that he report what actions he performed in accordance with his authority, in order to locate and capture him.”

” Anti-Corruption Lawyer guarantees the performance of its functions to protect the rights and interests of the Peruvian state with confidence, which has been proven by the work of its professional team to date,” the statement says.

Why was the third extradition request paralyzed?

In an interview with PTRSuperior Prosecutor Edgar Alfredo Rebaza, head of the Office of International Judicial Cooperation and Extraditions, stated that “the same Justice Department is aware that it has paralyzed the dispatch of the extradition notebook” based on a March 14, 2022 report. , signed Javier Alonso Pacheco PalaciosHead of the Prosecutor’s Office for Cases of Corruption of Officials.

According to Rebaza Vargas, the argument put forward by Pacheco Palacios is that considering a third extradition request in Spain would “damage the prosecutor’s position” and “delay” the processing of the two extradition requests sent to the prosecutor’s office. Government of Spain.

“We believe that the sending of the notepad was requested by the Supreme Court, approved by the Council of Ministers, and the ruling approving the request for extradition and therefore the sending of the notepad was published in Peruvian man. This position of the Council of Ministers would be paralyzed by the report of the prosecutor in charge of the case,” he added.

(Courtesy of Andina/RPP)