‘Unlikely’: Lawyer Harvey Colchado Doesn’t Believe Home Secretary Didn’t Know Dividing Document

Lawyer Luis Naldos, defender of the colonel of the PPP Harvey Colchado, described as an unusual recent retirement and replacement of an officer in the Digimin search department. According to the prosecutor Marita Barretotask force coordinator Public servicethis unfortunate measure was to affect their investigations.

“What happened here is really unusual (…) We are faced with a reality that is really disturbing, because, if you take the official version, there is a document that is not known who signed and which the minister did not know about. We say that the signatures of high-ranking officials are falsified at the heart of the intelligence apparatus of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,” he asked.

In an interview with RPP lawyer Harvey Colchado He pointed out that another hypothesis about the case is that there was an outrage “which was thought to go unnoticed”; however, he indicated that, given the reaction of the political class and public opinion to the measure, the decision was made to back down.

Similarly, Luis Naldos was skeptical that the document separating Harvey Colchado his position in the police could be issued without the permission of the Minister of the Interior, Willy Huertas. Although he acknowledged that there are positions of trust in the public administration, he recalled that his sponsor had become a public figure.

“This is under normal circumstances, but in a context where Colonel Colchado is at the center of the storm, the validity of investigations and administrative and disciplinary proceedings against him is publicly discussed, a second-level official such as a director who reports to the director general and minister is unlikely to will make a decision in this context in relation to a person whose identity is publicly identified. I find it almost unbelievable,” he said.

at another time Louis Naldos doubted that, in addition to the demand of the President Peter’s castlethere is a second process against Harvey Colchado “for events in which he has absolutely nothing to do with it.” Similarly, the lawyer admitted that it is fair to think that all the attacks the colonel receives come from the same source.

“If you draw up a sequence of events, then they will necessarily end with such a conclusion, because if you take into account that all this is unleashed as a result of the intervention on August 9 (raid on the Government Palace), which is a procedure requested and under the direction of Public service“The police are support, not direction,” he said.

Prosecutor asks for an investigation into alleged wrongdoing

Superior Prosecutor Marita Barreto submitted a document to the national prosecutor’s office this Wednesday to investigate alleged irregularities in the dismissal and replacement of PNP Colonel Harvey Colchado of the Digimin Search Division.

Also, the head of the Special Group for Combating Corruption of the Government indicated that the dismissal of Kolchado “contrary to the provisions of the Race Act and the situation of the personnel of the Peruvian National Police”.

Barreto, who is investigating the President Peter’s castle for allegedly being the leader of a criminal organization, he pointed out that the elimination of Colonel Colchado would be a usurpation of functions and an abuse of power. The higher prosecutor considered that there were “permanent obstacles to the activities of the Special Group”.

The document presented by Barreto indicates that the change of Colchado had permission from Digimin CEO Whitman Rios Adriansen.removed from office last Tuesday.

“These facts are arbitrary and prejudicial to the function of criminal prosecution of a crime Public service”, – indicates the prosecutor and requires the intervention of the Ministry of Industry and Trade.

RPP PODCAST: Congress Debriefs University System Reform, Condemns Flor Pablo

The legislator said that economic interests are behind the project, approved at the insistence of the plenary session of the parliament. On the other hand, MP Alex Paredes of the ruling Masters Bloc justified his group’s support for the project’s persistence despite the government’s compliance with the law.