adUnits.push({
code: ‘Rpp_politica_congreso_Nota_Interna1’,
mediaTypes: {
banner: {
sizes: (navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i)) ? [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100]] : [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100], [635, 90]]
}
},
bids: [{
bidder: ‘appnexus’,
params: {
placementId: ‘14149971’
}
},{
bidder: ‘rubicon’,
params: {
accountId: ‘19264’,
siteId: ‘314342’,
zoneId: ‘1604128’
}
},{
bidder: ‘amx’,
params: {
tagId: ‘MTUybWVkaWEuY29t’
}
},{
bidder: ‘oftmedia’,
params: {
placementId: navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i) ? ‘22617692’: ‘22617693’
}
}]
});
The plenary session of the Congress approved – by 99 votes to 0 and 4 abstentions – the report Commission on Parliamentary Ethics which declares the complaint against MP Freddie Ronald Diaz Monago justified and orders that he be removed from office for 120 days of legislature with a corresponding deduction from his assets.
Only four congressmen abstained from voting on the parliamentary report. ethics commission. They are: Jorge Flores Ankaki, Alfredo Pariona (Free Peru), Janet Rivas (Free Peru) and Jorge Coaila (Peru Bicentennial).
Last week, ethics commission unanimously approved final report recommending plenary session of Congress to suspend lawmaker for 120 days Fredy Diaz Monacoafter he was accused of drinking alcohol in his office and reportedly raped.
Former congresswoman Carol Wallsthe president of this parliamentary group, confirmed that the final report against Díaz Monago focuses on ethical conduct and is not an allegation of rape under investigation Public service.
Freddy Diaz case before the Ethics Commission
Among the findings, the task force reports that Díaz Monago drank alcohol in his office on July 26 and 27, that his lawyer admitted he had a sexual relationship with his worker, that he was accused of rape while intoxicated. unconscious before the Second Supreme Criminal Prosecutor’s Office.
In addition, the parliamentarian did not immediately respond to the lawsuit, as soon as he became aware of the complaint, in order to clarify the facts presented to him, having done this to the authorities five days later.
In this regard, it is concluded that the defendant committed a violation of ethical standards and an attack on the good image and reputation of a parliamentary institution. In addition, he violated the code of parliamentary ethics by committing actions that are not typical of a parliamentarian.
The analysis of the investigation is based on documents collected during the investigation, information disseminated in the media. In addition, the commission examined the complaint filed by the complainant and the statements made during the hearing on 22 August.
RPP PODCAST: Congress Debates University System Reform, Condemns Flor Pablo
The legislator said that economic interests are behind the project, approved at the insistence of the plenary session of the parliament. On the other hand, MP Alex Paredes of the ruling Magisterial Bloc justified his group’s support for the project’s persistence despite the government’s compliance with the law.
Source: RPP
I’m Liza Grey, an experienced news writer and author at the Buna Times. I specialize in writing about economic issues, with a focus on uncovering stories that have a positive impact on society. With over seven years of experience in the news industry, I am highly knowledgeable about current events and the ways in which they affect our daily lives.