The PNP General Inspectorate called Harvey Colchado this Wednesday due to a complaint by Pedro Castillo.

Inspector General National Police of Peru summoned on August 31, at 9:30 am, Colonel PNP Harvey Colchadocoordinator of the special police group that supports the public ministry, as part of the previous actions related to the complaint filed against him by the president Peter’s castle.

A few days ago the President Peter’s castlethrough his lawyer, Eduardo Pachas, submitted a formal letter to the Inspector General of Police, requesting that a sanctions process be initiated that would result in the removal of Colonel Harvey Colchado, head of the task force, for carrying out the search. warrant at the Government Palace, 9 August.

According to RPP sources, the president is asking for disciplinary proceedings and an investigation against the PPP colonel. Harvey Colchado and that at the end of this “a very serious sanction is imposed, therefore he is immediately retired” in accordance with the law governing the disciplinary regime of the police.

Eduardo Pachas, Presidential Counsel Peter’s castleHe also filed a complaint against the prosecutor. Hans Aguirrein charge of discretion, and Judge Raul Justiniano, who ordered a search of the presidential residence, which is located inside the Government Palace.

Argumentation of the request submitted by the President Peter’s castleit is mentioned that on August 9 Colonel Harvey Colchado and five more police officers from the special prosecutor’s office support group were present government palace conduct a search, blocking and search for arrest, in addition, Yennefer Paredes.

In this document, to which RPP had access, it is attributed Harvey Colchado “violating the inviolability of the president” for executing a search warrant to arrest and seize the property of the daughter-in-law of the head of state in the presidential residence located in the Government Palace.

In a letter to the police inspector, the head of state demands that, at the end of this disciplinary process, he be immediately dismissed as a “very serious sanction.” This official letter notes that the president has “materials and documents constituting secrets and state secrets” in the Government House.

For the protection of the President, Colonel Harvey Colchado would violate the immunity of the President by showing this zeal in government palace. For this reason, the Inspectorate National Police of Peru start a disciplinary process that will end with his retirement.

He also seeks to punish the judge and the prosecutor.

In addition to requesting sanctions against PNP Colonel Harvey Colchado for his actions during the raid on government palace On Aug. 9, President Pedro Castillo is seeking sanctions against the judge who ordered the operation and the prosecutor who conducted it, Eduardo Pachas, the president’s lawyer, said on Thursday.

“The (request) is directed against whoever ordered and carried out” the raid, Pachas said in statements to RPP News citing judge Raul Justiniano and public prosecutor Hans Aguirre as responsible for the failed arrest Yennefer Peredesdaughter-in-law Lock.

The president’s lawyer pointed out that the judge’s decision contradicted Article 117 of the Constitution “on the inviolability of a citizen.” President of the RepublicIn this regard, he pointed out that the internal control bodies Power of attorney and from Public service determine whether the procedure was legal. “If it’s illegal, they will have a decision about it,” he said.

Pachas He also referred to the petition submitted Peter’s castle Inspector General of Police to initiate a sanctions process against Harvey Colchado, head of the task force, leading to his dismissal from the PNP.

He indicated that the request was submitted “because there is a message to the nation (oh Peter’s castle)”, in which he “declared the illegality of the interference, the search in his house”.

RPP PODCAST: Congress Debates University System Reform, Condemns Flor Pablo

The legislator said that economic interests are behind the project, approved at the insistence of the plenary session of the parliament. On the other hand, MP Alex Paredes of the ruling Magisterial Bloc justified his group’s support for the project’s persistence despite the government’s compliance with the law.