adUnits.push({
code: ‘Rpp_politica_judiciales_Nota_Interna1’,
mediaTypes: {
banner: {
sizes: (navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i)) ? [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100]] : [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100], [635, 90]]
}
},
bids: [{
bidder: ‘appnexus’,
params: {
placementId: ‘14149971’
}
},{
bidder: ‘rubicon’,
params: {
accountId: ‘19264’,
siteId: ‘314342’,
zoneId: ‘1604128’
}
},{
bidder: ‘amx’,
params: {
tagId: ‘MTUybWVkaWEuY29t’
}
},{
bidder: ‘oftmedia’,
params: {
placementId: navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i) ? ‘22617692’: ‘22617693’
}
}]
});
The Judicial Branch (SP) stated that next Friday, August 12 Two appeals for the protection of rights submitted by the defense of President Pedro Castillo against the prosecutor’s office will be considered with a request nullity of the investigation for alleged crimes of a criminal organization and personal concealment to the detriment of the state.
Hearings will be presided over by the Chief Justice John Charles Checkley. The first one will take place at 10:00. and the arguments of the defense will be assessed in relation to the case that was brought by the State Department against the head of state after the departure of the former Minister of the Interior, Mariano Gonzalez.
The second will be at 11 am, and the arguments regarding the alleged violation of the President’s right to the presumption of innocence because, in the opinion of the defense, the statements would not have been confidential in the course of the investigations in which he was involved.
Request for Cancellation of Investigations
The day before through your lawyer Benji EspinozaPresident Pedro Castillo presented to the Preparatory Court of Inquiry of the Court two appeals for protection of rights against the General Prosecutor’s Office demanding that the investigation against him on charges of vices in the case that follows it for an alleged personal concealment and for an alleged information leak from the public ministry.
According to Espinoza’s statements to the newspaper Trade, motion to dismiss investigation in case initiated following removal of former Interior Minister Mariano González because his testimony was taken by the Ministry of State without the presence of a lawyer heads of state.
“Why is the statement taken from Mariano Gonzalez as a lone witnessalone with the prosecution, without summoning the defense, preventing cross-examination, preventing the defense from participating in the trial? Espinoza asked the aforementioned medium.
In addition, the lawyer pointed out that in the case of alleged leaks, they are prohibited in accordance with Criminal Procedure Law and that reserved proceedings cannot be disclosed in any way.
“The prosecutor’s office is responsible (for this) intentional action or omission”, he declared Trade.
With these two new resources, add three protections of rights from the prosecutor’s office represented by the protection of the head of state. The first was rejected, in the first place, by Judge Checkley, and the removal of the inclusion of the President in the preliminary investigation in the case of “Decentralized Provias – Puente Tarata” was requested.
Source: RPP
I’m Liza Grey, an experienced news writer and author at the Buna Times. I specialize in writing about economic issues, with a focus on uncovering stories that have a positive impact on society. With over seven years of experience in the news industry, I am highly knowledgeable about current events and the ways in which they affect our daily lives.