Congressman Mo Brooks (R -Ala,) is completely opposed to any new weapons restrictions – even the military style of assault weapons – because people need them to “restore” the our government, he told Fox News on Sunday.
Such action should only be taken if America is to become “dictatorial,” Brooks told presenter Sandra Smith.
Brooks is completely and utterly unreasonably convinced that the last presidential election was “stolen” from Donald Trump, who could be considered dictatorial.
The MP pointed to the slippery slope when he immediately approached Smith and angrily defended his fantasy about a fraudulent election.
Smith said in the “record” that there was still no “evidence or proof provided” about the rigged elections.
“Oh, no, that’s wrong. “It’s completely wrong,” Brooks said before Smith pointed him out.
“He’s telling me you haven’t done your homework yet … I’m taking the last word on the matter,” Brooks exclaimed to Fox News presenter Sandra Smith, after pointing out that there was no evidence that it happened. the 2020 election. stolen. Trumpet
Smith, to his credit, holds his position pic.twitter.com/rFwRztuwIJ
– Aaron Rupar (@arupar) May 29, 2022
Brooks argues that the whole idea of the Second Amendment is to arm civilians to occupy the country when necessary – and that not having enough weapons would stimulate the appetites of “dictators”. However, this has not happened in 10 years. The Assault Weapons Ban expired at the end of 2004.
Exactly what the architects had in mind in the Second Amendment about the protection of the “well-regulated militia”. Not as clear as Brooks says. Many believe the constitution defines exactly what the “well-regulated militia” says: not beer-loving friends who blow up targets with military-class assault rifles.
Source: Huffpost
