The anti-corruption lawyer denied the information that the administrator earns SGD 35,000 per month: “this is the accumulated amount for 7 months.”

Yesterday, Sunday, the Panorama program broadcast a report saying that the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office hired Katya Portugal Zevallos, a bachelor’s degree in management, who, without much experience, received a salary of 35 thousand Singapore dollars in the institution.

In addition, some chats were shown in which the alleged sentimental relationship between the worker and the head of the organization, Javier Pacheco, was evident.

Prior to these accusations, Pacheco Palacios, in dialogue with RPP Noticias, denied that the official in question received this salary on a monthly basis and denied participating in the chat shown on the program.

“S/35 thousand is accumulated”

The prosecutor called what was broadcast by the program “delusions and false accusations” and pointed out that not a young woman, but a 41-year-old woman performed “a technical function in managing the civil reparations module.” entities.

In addition, he stressed that for this task he does not earn S / 35 thousand per month, and this amount is accumulated over 7 months of work.

“Within the scale set by the Attorney General’s Office, from technicians, high school graduates, who have the level of legal or administrative assistant, they receive 5,000 soles in the specialized prosecutor’s office (…) When committing the amount of the contract, which is a service order, it goes to the full amount on time and during the period when the service is performed Pretend that S / 35 thousand is made per month, this is completely wrong, it is accumulated, “he said.

“(Accumulate) for 7 or 6 months, because there is no uniformity and because of the emission. But this should correspond to a period of 7 months. This is documented,” he added.

In addition, the lawyer pointed out that the profile required for the position of Zevallos Portugal is that of an administrative technician and that he does not participate in the formulation of the terms of reference, but rather they are set by the Ministry of Justice (Minhus).

“This work was done by an admin technician, and that’s a profile. I don’t sign a contract, a request is made, and three people join this job last year (…) I never issue service orders, this is strictly controlled by the Ministry of Justice. The only thing that is being done is a demand,” he said.