adUnits.push({
code: ‘Rpp_politica_actualidad_Nota_Interna1’,
mediaTypes: {
banner: {
sizes: (navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i)) ? [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100]] : [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100], [635, 90]]
}
},
bids: [{
bidder: ‘appnexus’,
params: {
placementId: ‘14149971’
}
},{
bidder: ‘rubicon’,
params: {
accountId: ‘19264’,
siteId: ‘314342’,
zoneId: ‘1604128’
}
},{
bidder: ‘amx’,
params: {
tagId: ‘MTUybWVkaWEuY29t’
}
},{
bidder: ‘oftmedia’,
params: {
placementId: navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i) ? ‘22617692’: ‘22617693’
}
}]
});
Humberto Abanto, lawyer for the former Minister of Housing, Gainer Alvarado, questioned this Monday the arrest of his sponsor in Lima’s La Molina district. According to his version, police officers They did not have a court order when it came to the intervention of a former official who was being investigated on suspicion of involvement in a criminal network run by former President Pedro Castillo.
The lawyer recalled that although the judiciary announced Alvarado’s preventive detention for 36 months through a tweet, social media posts cannot replace the Constitution’s provisions on freedom and personal security.
So, surrender He reiterated that under the terms of Magna Carta, a person could only be detained on “a written and reasoned order of a judge” or if they committed a crime at the scene of the crime.
“At the time of Gainer Alvarado’s intervention, the facts showed that the police did not have a writ of injunction in the form in which it is described in the Constitution. What they did was take a man, arrest him without a court order and set him up without legal grounds,” he criticized.
“Article two [de la Constitución], subsection 24, letter F requires a written and reasoned instruction from the referee, not a tweet. Tweets are not legally binding. Tweets cannot limit any rights,” he added.
Why did Humberto Abanto take over the defense of Gainer Alvarado?
On the other side, Humberto Abantowho has already stated that he will appeal against protection of rightscommented that he took over the legal defense former owner of theafter he walked into his office and stated that he was “in a campaign in which legal panic is flaring up.”
“The rights of the people do not depend on whether I sympathize with their political ideas or do not condemn the political actions of the government to which they belonged,” he argued.
When asked if he believes in the innocence of Gainer Alvarado, the lawyer replied: “I believe in his statement and it is up to the Ministry of State to accept his statement, to prove his guilt.”
“Protection of fundamental rights must be separated from our political likes or dislikes,” he said.
Source: RPP
I am Emma White and I currently work for Buna Times. My specialty is the politics section of the website, where I aim to provide readers with informative and engaging content on current events. In addition to my professional experience in journalism, I hold a Bachelor’s degree in English Literature from Princeton University.