Zoraida Avalos demands a new trial against Rodolfo Orellana for illegal collaboration to commit a crime

Former Attorney of the Nation, Zoraida Avalosin dialogue with RPP News, explained the reasons why he asked Power of attorney prescription of the crimes of forgery, ideological fraud, procedural fraud and attempted fraud against Rodolfo Orellanasentenced in February 2022.

It has to do with a newspaper article. Trade in which it was found that by this action of the Supreme Prosecutor Orellana Rengifo He could have been released from custody because no other preventive measure was in effect.

About itAvalos indicated that he requested a new trial for the crime unlawful association for the purpose of committing a crime because there were errors in the processing of the process.

“This is a business that started in 2007. I show that there are huge violations, because in the question of unlawful complicity in the commission of crimes, they exonerate all other defendants. I believe that they should not be justified, because they miscalculate the deadline, ”he stressed.

“They count it from 2007 and I say it should be counted from 2014 when they were arrested. Therefore, I declare that there must be a new court,” he said.

“It’s not true that he will get out of prison”

Besides, Avalos pointed out that it was not true that Rodolfo Orellana would be released from prison due to the statute of limitations for the 4 above crimes.

“It’s not true that he comes out on the basis of this opinion, because he has many more processes. It won’t affect other cases either, because the Supreme Court has already established that even if the original crime prescribes, there are grounds for a money laundering conviction,” he explained.

In turn, he indicated that he acted only “in accordance with the law”, given that 8 of the 9 accusations received by his office regarding orellana they have already been written.

“This is one of the hundreds of cases that the convicts have. orellana (…) In this case, if we talk about my office, 9 charges. Of these, 8 were already registered upon arrival. The situation that I show in my opinion. I show violations that occurred during processing, ”he explained.

In this sense, he clarified that there had been a delay “for 5 years” from the investigation “to the stage of indictment” in relation to the accused, and, moreover, an incorrect criminal attitude was seen in this.

“Here they saw ideal competition, that is, when all crimes are brought together. On the contrary, the real competition, which should be seen here, is when every crime adds up sorrows, ”he said. said.

“In this case, I show that (…) illegal cooperation for the purpose of committing a crime should never have come under the definition of an ideal match, because Supreme Court, the 2006 plenary agreement established that illegal association for the purpose of committing a crime is an independent crime, therefore, it is an independent one. That is why I am saving this crime,” he added.

According to the Supreme Prosecutor, the defendant himself and the co-defendants requested recipe the aforementioned crimes and that it was within the provisions of the law.

“We, as prosecutors, must act in accordance with the law. In this petition for annulment, the condemned, orellana, also represents his petition to the court for an injunction, because the facts are already written. When the facts dictate, what can we do?” he stressed.

“He Power of attorney You must act according to the law. We, as defenders of the rule of law, cannot act outside the law, it can even be a creditor on an application for malfeasance,” he added.

On the other hand, Avalos indicated that he asked the relevant authorities to take action on alleged violations committed during the process.

“At the conclusion, I take copies of all procedural materials and send them to the National Control Body of the Ministry of Public Administration for review of violations. I also ask Power of attorney make a copy of the entire trial so that you can see where the violations were committed that led to the assignment of this case, arrive at my office when the action is already assigned, ”he said.