What would Betsy Chavez look for in collaboration on errands? That’s what the experts say

After the Special Group of Prosecutors to Combat Corruption in Government (EFICCOP), together with a special group National Policesearched 41 properties, including the home of suspended congresswoman Betsy Chavez, in the Los Niños case, criminal defense lawyers Mario Amoretti And Jefferson Moreno They explained the reasons for the intervention and the possible scenario that would await those involved.

For Moreno, the fact that Chávez Chino has shown willingness to cooperate with justice is a response to the intent minimize procedural danger pending a possible request by the prosecutor’s office for pre-trial detention.

“Not only (to avoid pre-trial detention), but also the search warrant can be appealed. When the prosecutor’s office arrives, searches and issues a court decision, you can appeal. Most likely, they will go to the courtroom and say: why appeal if I told the prosecutor’s office to come to my house. What they do covers procedural danger (…). Remember that if tomorrow, the day after tomorrow, or a month from now, prosecutors want to request measures (preliminary arrest, house arrest, prevented exit, whatever they want), they will always demand procedural danger,” he told RPP News Expansion.

“With the permission of Congress, this type of trial can be heldbecause, since we are dealing with high-ranking statesmen, this could not be done without lifting immunity. With this cancellation, the prosecutor’s office can carry out any investigative actions, including restrictions of the law,” he added.

“Accomplices will be punished in the same way as the author”

On the other hand, a criminal defense lawyer Mario Amoretti He specified that the information provided by Jorge Hernandez Fernandez, nicknamed “El Espanyol”, could shed light on who would be the accomplices of the failed coup by President Pedro Castillo, and assured that they could be sentenced to the same sentence as criminal.

“Definitely yes (may shed light on accomplices) and they will have the status of principal accomplices; that is, a person whose cooperation or intervention is necessary for the commission of a criminal act and deserves the same punishment as the author,” he said.

“According to the decision of the Supreme Court, a novice employee, such as Zamir Villaverde and Karelim Lopez at that time, provided data, certain instructions, certain evidence that certain individuals were involved in criminal acts. What happened and why did the Chief Justice order a search and seizure this time? This is based on the fact that the Ministry of Health has presented new evidence, new data, confirming what was said earlier. It is also likely that El Espanyol has accepted this figure and is providing more accurate and specific data.. The prosecutor can request, but the decision on the advisability of conducting a search, seizure or deprivation of liberty is made by the judge, based on whether the testimony or evidence presented convinces him of the commission of such a crime,” he concluded.