HomePoliticsThe judiciary rejected the...

The judiciary rejected the application for pre-trial detention against Vladimir Serron.

Former Governor of Junin and General Secretary of Peru Libre, Vladimir Cerrón. | Fountain: Andean

adUnits.push({
code: ‘Rpp_politica_judiciales_Nota_Interna1’,
mediaTypes: {
banner: {
sizes: (navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i)) ? [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100]] : [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100], [635, 90]]
}
},
bids: [{
bidder: ‘appnexus’,
params: {
placementId: ‘14149971’
}
},{
bidder: ‘rubicon’,
params: {
accountId: ‘19264’,
siteId: ‘314342’,
zoneId: ‘1604128’
}
},{
bidder: ‘amx’,
params: {
tagId: ‘MTUybWVkaWEuY29t’
}
},{
bidder: ‘oftmedia’,
params: {
placementId: navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i) ? ‘22617692’: ‘22617693’
}
}]
});

He Power of attorney denied the prosecutor’s motion to impose 36 months of pre-trial detention on Vladimir Cerrón, founder and leader of the Peru Libre party, for violating the three rules of conduct set for him during an investigation that is ongoing in connection with alleged illegal funding of his political group.

Judge Leodan Cristobal Ayala stated the request public service so that the mandate to appear, with the restrictions that Serrón Rojas is under pressure, will be canceled, in which case he will be given 36 months of preventive detention.

Request

Anti-money laundering prosecutor Richard Rojas Gomez made such a request, alleging that the leader Free Peru he violated the three rules of conduct that were set for him in this criminal trial: by failing to pay the financial security of 20,000 sols, by failing to undergo a biometric check, and by communicating with three witnesses in this investigation.

However, the justice of the peace dismissed the arguments put forward by the court. public service “Because the respondent has not previously expressly requested Vladimir Serron strict adherence to each of the rules of conduct before a tax withdrawal claim” of his mandate to appear with restrictions.

For this reason, the justice of the peace directly demanded from the defendant to continue to observe each of the rules of conduct that was imposed on him in this process.


Source: RPP

- A word from our sponsors -

Most Popular

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

More from Author

- A word from our sponsors -

Read Now