adUnits.push({
code: ‘Rpp_politica_judiciales_Nota_Interna1’,
mediaTypes: {
banner: {
sizes: (navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i)) ? [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100]] : [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100], [635, 90]]
}
},
bids: [{
bidder: ‘appnexus’,
params: {
placementId: ‘14149971’
}
},{
bidder: ‘rubicon’,
params: {
accountId: ‘19264’,
siteId: ‘314342’,
zoneId: ‘1604128’
}
},{
bidder: ‘amx’,
params: {
tagId: ‘MTUybWVkaWEuY29t’
}
},{
bidder: ‘oftmedia’,
params: {
placementId: navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i) ? ‘22617692’: ‘22617693’
}
}]
});
Third National Court of Criminal Appeal The judiciary declared unfounded the complaint filed by the National Prosecutor’s Office against the decision 36 months of pre-trial detention against the founder of Peru Libre, Vladimir Serrón, and imposed restrictions on participation in the investigation of alleged crimes of a criminal organization and money laundering.
The ruling, handed down by Justices of the Peace Magallanes Rodríguez, Salinas Siccia and Contreras Cuscano, stated that the appeal filed by the High Prosecutor’s Office for Criminal Cases, which specializes in money laundering, will not be substantiated, as the contested decision is properly substantiated.
“According to the analysis, The Court concludes that the contested decision is properly reasoned because from all the arguments set forth in the decision, there is no evidence that there was a formal or substantial violation,” the document says.
“From what was analysed, it was confirmed that the appeals lacked arguments to change the appeal, so they should be rejected. Thus, the power of the Court to review is closed in relation to the principles of limitation or recursive congruence, given that only the procedural danger was the subject of a dispute, while maintaining the effectiveness of other significant assumptions, as well as a decision of proportionality in relation to appearance with restrictions, subject to the rules of conduct, – he notes.
Prosecutor Vela: “Mr Cerrón’s procedural behavior at the Ministry of Public Administration was obstructive”
Formerly prosecutor Rafael Vela pointed out that Serrón Rojas’s behavior was obstructive because he could use Peru Libre, the party of which he is the founder, as a legal entity.
“Mr Cerron’s procedural behavior at the Ministry of Public Administration was obstructive. As well as assumptions about what criminal organizations do when they are in control. One of the documents that he presented as a guarantee of his level of labor relations is the certificate of the Peru Libre party, which he manages and uses. Therefore, for the prosecutor’s office, this does not generate condemnation, but the instrumentalization of a legal entity, ”he specified then.
Source: RPP
I am Emma White and I currently work for Buna Times. My specialty is the politics section of the website, where I aim to provide readers with informative and engaging content on current events. In addition to my professional experience in journalism, I hold a Bachelor’s degree in English Literature from Princeton University.