Report in question gives priests, pastors and religious leaders the freedom to choose whether or not to celebrate the union
In the preliminary measure, Tabata and Pedro claim that the issue is not the material constitutionality of the project, but the “the impossibility of the enforcing authority to submit to a vote a legislative proposal that violates the due constitutional legislative process, given that it relegates matters within the competence of the Plenary to the Commission, in addition to the flagrant intention of altering and deleting an immutable clause”.
In an interview with Rede Pernambuco de Rádios and Alberes Xavier’s blog, deputy Eurico stated that his vote against the recognition of homosexual marriage was in accordance with the constitution, which “only recognizes the union between a man and a woman”, according to his words.
“I gave my opinion, and the project was discussed. We had public hearings and there was a lot of discussion in the committee which, in the vote, was in favor of our report, rejecting the issue of gay marriage, which was an old project of Clodovil”, reported Eurico.
By Ezatamentchy
Source: Maxima
I am an experienced author and journalist with a passion for lifestyle journalism. I currently work for Buna Times, one of the leading news websites in the world. I specialize in writing stories about health, wellness, fashion, beauty, interior design, and more. My articles have been featured on major publications such as The Guardian and The Huffington Post.