Could Kategate be a distraction from Charles III’s cancer?

In London, like all over the world, things are going crazy. Kate Middleton’s first real misstep gets the crowd excited. How could the Princess of Wales, so perfect, make such a communication blunder by revealing a fake family portrait on Sunday? What is behind this blunder? Is he hiding something? If so, what could he be hiding other than the reasons for his surgery? For several days now, netizens and tabloids have been mixing in their two cents each, losing us a little further into the abyss of speculation.

Kensington Palace communications in this fake photo case raise questions. How could an organization manage everything about current affairs and the privacy of the Wells and their children to allow a photoshopped photo to be released without thinking about the details? We especially think about the numerous retouches visible when zoomed in, or even the absence of the princess’s wedding ring and engagement ring. Amateur work. And in this case, Kate herself.

“Planned sabotage”.

This “Kategate,” as it’s already been nicknamed by the channel, is also intriguing because it eclipses all news about the royal family. Strangely enough, nobody is interested anymore in the fate of Charles III, who recently suffered from cancer. Apart from two public appearances in mid-February, one in Sandringham to go to mass and another in London to meet Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, the king has largely disappeared from the radar since the announcement of his cancer. We still wonder. this is the case of the contract between the British press and Buckingham Palace. Or, if we pull the string, it is the case of the treaty signed between the two palaces, Kensington and Buxingham. In other words, could the failed Welsh link operation actually be a maneuver not to do? no talk about Charles III’s cancer?

Since absolutely no information is being leaked to the English press, we asked royal correspondent Richard Fitzwilliams for his opinion. “The idea that this was a planned diversion due to Charles’ illness is a conspiracy theory,” he says. And there are many.” According to the expert, Charles III was quite transparent from the beginning. Although he did not reveal which cancer he was suffering from, the sovereign “spoke openly about his prostate, which helped to raise public awareness of this topic”. “We don’t know the details of his cancer, we only know that he is undergoing treatment, but although he is unable to perform public duties, he is able to carry out basic royal duties as we know. we saw.”

“it was wrong”

On the other hand, Richard Fitzwilliams talks more about the crisis facing the Windsors, particularly William and Kate, “the world’s most talked-about royal couple.” “Royal week was weird,” he confirms. There has been media hysteria around the world over how Catherine edited a Mother’s Day photo to allay fears about her health. This episode was very embarrassing, especially since the office did not notice the absence of her wedding ring and engagement ring until the photo was published.

For the royal commentator, Kensington Palace was a mistake from the start. “It was a mistake to let two-and-a-half months go by without official news about Kate’s health as she was seriously ill. The Chamber’s PR team has proven to be woefully out of touch with reality.” For example, Richard Fitwilliams mentions William’s last-minute departure for “personal reasons” on 27 February during a tribute to the Prince of Wales’ godfather, King Constantine of Greece. A deviation that some have linked to Kate Middleton’s health problems. And this, despite sources close to Kensington Palace saying the princess is “doing well” and getting up at her home in Adelaide Cottage. “This has given rise to endless and particularly damaging online speculation,” analyzes Richard Fitzwilliams.

LISTEN TO SCANDALS!