Despite his desire for reconciliation, Charles III would be “firmly determined” not to restore Harry to the monarchy

“Have the king and Harry spoken?” Yes! Does this mean a return home, even temporarily? No.” in the columns of Daily Mail: , the voices are unanimous that Prince Harry should not make a grand comeback within the British monarchy. And this, despite the fact that Charles III refused some of his royal duties, announcing that he was suffering from cancer.

Claims that his younger son could take over some of his royal duties would therefore be incorrect. Sources cited by the tabloid in London claim that His Majesty the King has even “firmly decided” that the Duke of Sussex will no longer become an active member of the royal family “one way or another”. Emphasizing that this in no way prevents him from reconciling with himself. Prince William, the main heir to the throne, would also share this opinion.

“Half in, half out”

This update comes after speculation increased this weekend. As noted Daily Mail:OR? Times In particular, it has been claimed that Prince Harry is ready to return to a “temporary royal role” to support his father during his illness. Now living in California with his wife Meghan Markle and two children, the 39-year-old prince is said to have been encouraged by the “warm exchanges” between him and his father. He would tell friends that he was happy to “play royal while his father is sick,” he continues. Daily Mail:. However, according to sources close to the crown, Charles, Prince of Wales and the rest of the Windsor clan are “in full agreement” that the terms of the “Sandringham Summit” should be kept.

This meeting thus recorded the departure of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle from the royal family in January 2020. At the time, Queen Elizabeth II made it clear that the half-in, half-out approach her grandson wanted was unworkable.

LISTEN TO SCANDALS!