After the startling revelations contained in the memoirs of the Duke of Sussex, the British media accused him of wanting to “destroy” his clan.
Sex, drugs, fighting with Prince William… Four months before the coronation of King Charles III, Prince Harry made startling revelations in his memoirs. The alternative , the contents of which appeared in the press before their official publication, which was scheduled for Tuesday, January 10. The book was indeed mistakenly put on sale for a few hours on Thursday, January 5, in Spain. The next day, the tabloids, conveying the duke of Sussex’s multiple confidences, accused him of wanting to destroy the British royal family.
In the video, “Silence is treason,” says Prince Harry in one of the interviews
“Cruel Mission”
If the Windsors have not commented on the words of the Duke of Sussex at the moment, then the British media, in turn, are heartily rejoicing. “No one is spared in Harry’s brutal mission to destroy the family,” reads the caption. DailyMirror. Sun Meanwhile, the exiled prince in California is accused of “betraying his own family for millions of dollars”. that DailyMail: In his turn, he considered that the 30-year-old chose to “spit as much venom as possible” in his work.
Prince William’s ‘unpleasant’ portrait
It is undoubtedly Prince William that the Duke of Sussex has reserved his strongest attacks. Thus, Prince Harry described the heir to the throne as a “sworn enemy”. He accuses his older brother of “running him down” in 2019 during a row over Meghan Markle, whom the duke had married the previous year. She also makes the bitter row in an interview to be broadcast on ITV on Sunday January 8, in which she insists Prince William was desperate for her to hit him in turn. He later apologized.
For royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams, the “worst part” of the book is “William’s character”. According to him, Prince Harry here represents his brother as “someone who betrayed his trust (…) Someone who really attacked him.” “It is not a very flattering portrait for the future king,” adds the specialist. In his memoirs, Prince Harry also explains that he was against William remarrying their father, now the Queen’s wife, Camilla, for fear she would make an “ugly mother-in-law”.
Scandals, Lady Diana. the broken fate of the icon
LISTEN TO THE PODCAST!
explosive discoveries
Agreed The TelegraphHe also criticized his father for suggesting the Sussexes had “spent too much on him”, accusing him of keeping Meghan Markle away, who had taken risks with him and “taken over the monarchy”. In The alternativePrince Harry really shows himself without a filter. He admits to taking cocaine, killing 25 Taliban during his missions in Afghanistan, describes how he lost his virginity and says he consulted a woman who would allow him to have a spiritual connection with his mother, Diana, died in 2013 During the car accident in Paris in 1997.
An unprecedented situation
“I don’t think we’ve ever seen a situation like this where a member of the royal family attacked the institution in the most public way,” said Craig Prescott, a constitutional scholar at the university. Bangor in Wales. A conflict which, according to the expert, can make the British question the monarchy. “If this goes on for any significant period of time, it’s been going on for a year or two, people might start to wonder if we should start thinking about the monarchy differently. Is the reform necessary?” he continued.
In the video, the trailer of Prince Harry’s interview with ITV
Coronation of King Charles III
Despite what is written in the book, Prince Harry reaffirms in an interview with ITV that he wants to “reconcile” with his family. But he wants to point out everyone’s responsibilities in this alienation. Already in a documentary series Harry and Meghan Aired on Netflix in December, the 38-year-old prince explained that he wanted to give his version of ‘Megxit’, which took place in 2020. So far, Buckingham Palace has not responded. Sun citing sources close to King Charles III and Prince William who are upset by the book’s claims.
For expert Richard Fitzwilliams, “The Sussexes have all the cards in their hands because the House cannot easily fight back.” This book is “as destructive as the coronation approaches,” he laments. Until recently, many believed that Harry might attend this historic event alongside his family. This is no longer an option. Asked Friday morning, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak explained that it was “not appropriate” for him to “comment on matters related to the royal family.”
Source: Le Figaro
