After investors on Twitter reviewed Elon Musk’s offer, Tesla shareholders who sued him in another case asked the judge to suspend Musk’s comment in their case.
Tesla shareholders filed a fraud lawsuit against Musk in 2018 after posting 218 tweets about the company’s private acquisition, which he did not.
A federal judge ruled last week that Musk’s claims that he provided funding for Tesla’s private acquisition were misleading and misleading. The judge also found that Musk had made false statements Careless and fully aware of the facts That he was misrepresented.
Musk’s behavior in Tesla’s case is particularly relevant today as he seeks to capture Twitter, which he advocated to enforce free speech. Twitter rejected his hostile offer, but Musk indicated over the weekend that it was not over yet.
Despite a judge’s decision in the Tesla case, Musk reiterated the exact same claim – that he got funding for the automaker’s private relocation – at last week’s TED 2022 conference in Vancouver, Canada.
“So I was forced to illegally renounce the SEC,” he told regulators at the Securities and Exchange Commission, according to Reuters. “Those fools.”
“I was forced to admit that I lied to Tesla to save his life, and that’s the only reason,” Musk added.
Following Muskie’s TED comments, Tesla shareholders asked U.S. District Judge Edward Chen to close Muskie’s “public campaign”. Send conflicting and false narratives ”About his tweets from 2018.
Musk and Tesla paid $ 20 million in civil penalties after Tesla tweeted and Musk resigned as president of Tesla to resolve SEC claims that he defrauded investors on his own. Fake messages.
Musk “I Have No Real Planning” When he was trying to take Tesla personally, New York Times columnist James Stewart told CNBC last week. “Only now did he find out [Musk] Made with impulse. “
Referring to Muskie’s Twitter offer, Stewart asked, “Are we dealing with a similar situation today?
Source: Huffpost
