Instead, Google should share a component of data with competitors to strengthen competition in the search market.
In the United States, the court issued a decision in the case of antimonopoly against Google. Columbia Amit Mechta judge ruled that the company is not obligated to sell the Chrome browser and the Android operating system. Instead, Google should share the data share with competitors to increase competition in the search market. Reuters reported it.
It is noted that the sharing of the alphabet of the maternal company increased by 7.2% after the publication of the decision. Investors positively accepted the news, as Google will also continue making multi -billion dollar apple payments that criticize antimonopoly authorities. Apple papers rose 3%.
The court believes that Google’s competition is strengthened by companies working with artificial intelligence.
“Here the court is asked to look at the crystal ball and look at the future. This is not the very powerful part of the judge,” the judge said.
According to him, growing the popularity of ChatGPT and other solutions shows that II companies can compete with Google that is better than traditional search engines developers. The judge emphasized that in the conditions of the appearance of new technologies, there is no need to request the sale of Chrome or Android.
It has been reported that data transfer to competitors will be a call for Google, but maintaining major products has reduced the fear of investors.
According to experts, this decision will open new opportunities for the development of AI-Search chat bots and engines. Users are gradually being trained in new services, so the risk for Google is not immediately.
The court also allowed Google to continue Apple and other manufacturers of devices for using the default search system. According to Morgan Stanley’s analysts, the cost of such a payment reached $ 20 billion a year.
The court believes that in the context of AI growth, there is no prohibition on these payments. At the same time, Google has lost its right to terminate exclusive contracts that prevented the installation of competitors’ applications.
Keep in mind that Google should pay $ 314 million after a court jury in San Jose (California) guilty of illegal Android user data assembly through a mobile network.
It is also reported that Google has lost in the case of a monopoly in the field of advertising technology.
News from CORRESPONDENT.NET On the telegram and whatsapp. Subscribe to our channels https://t.me/KorresPondentNet and WhatsApp
Source: korrespondent
I’m Liza Grey, an experienced news writer and author at the Buna Times. I specialize in writing about economic issues, with a focus on uncovering stories that have a positive impact on society. With over seven years of experience in the news industry, I am highly knowledgeable about current events and the ways in which they affect our daily lives.