Cotton’s absurd view came from Parliament’s offensive line, which focused on Jackson’s time as an ombudsman representing Guantanamo prisoners accused of terrorism. As an ombudsman, Jackson manages his clients.
“He’s in the federal public defender’s office,” Roberts told Cotton on Fox News’ America Reports. “He said he could not choose his customers. “It’s really a matter of due process, and I wonder why there is such a connection between Judge Jackson and the Nazis and the Nuremberg Trials.”
Cotton noted that Jackson was appointed by four terrorism suspects as ombudsmen, but continued to represent one after moving to private training. He also criticized his support on behalf of clients when he represented them.
That’s right. So you don’t think this is a very distant bridge to connect Nuremberg and the Nazis? Roberts insisted.
“No, John, again, in three separate cases, he is not an American citizen accused of a crime under our Constitution,” Cotton said, “but” foreign terrorists who commit violence against Americans.
In fact, it was ruled by the Supreme Court at a time when Guantanamo Bay prisoners were entitled to Habea Corps rights because the United States exercised full jurisdiction and control over the base.
Jackson Explained This At His Hearings Last Month. He also explained that he was one of the inmates he represented as public prosecutor in private practice because the client did not know him in his office. He said he was asked to work on their case when partners learned he was already representing that client.
Source: Huffpost
