Io prosecutor said Sarah Harris said that “some” had removed employees who were on a trial filed complaints at the office of a special counselor.
US President Administration Donald Trump has asked the Supreme Court to suspend the judge’s decision to restore thousands of working civil servants, fired under the state’s federal official’s state -reducing program. CNN reported it.
In the case, noted, the federal judge in San Francisco issued an initial trial, requested from more than a dozen federal agencies to return jobs to more than 16 thousand workers in the probation period.
According to the acting prosecutor General Sarah Harris, the decision of United States District Judge William Alsup “forced the government to start the huge -scale administrative steps to restore thousands of eliminated work workers for many days.”
The administration’s request appeared when the Federal Appeal Court in San Francisco considered a similar appeal from the administration filed on March 14.
Alsup’s decision is one of the rare successes of federal trade unions that have argued the administration’s efforts to reduce labor. While other federal judges refused to stop the wave of dismissal, Alsup said he decided, because he believed that the staff management (OPM) management (OPM) was illegally ordered by the beginning of this year to remove employees on the test deadline, which, as a rule, worked less than a year.
The decision was made in the case that trading unions and other parties began with the OPM’s role in dismissal, affecting thousands of employees and caused shock at various federal institutions. Some of the deleted ministers were re -accepted.
As you know, the Trump administration is aimed at workers who are in a test, as they have fewer job guarantees and are easier to remove them. Although they, as a rule, cannot challenge their removal of the protection council of merit systems, they can do this if the decision is made using the “bias of politics” or “family position”.
Harris informed the Supreme Court that the “few” deleted workers on a trial filed complaints at the office of a special counselor. He says the ALSUP’s decision is contrary to the administrative procedures established by Congress to resolve such layouts.
“The announcement of an open time to challenge the management of federal personnel is especially unreasonable, as Congress has created a completely different system to solve legal problems related to the dismissal of federal employees,” he said. And he added permission to trade unions to “go to the district court and pass the claims that the injured federal employees himself could not nominate, would undermine this whole process.”
Aizen’s standards, which represent plaintiffs in state defenders of state democracy, believe that the court will support the ALSUP’s decision.
“Trump’s administration illegally fired thousands of federal employees, as Judge Alsup had properly noticed. The administration’s attempts to hinder help once failed, and now they turned to the Supreme Court – unreasonable,” he said.
Remember that the federal court in California has ordered the six American departments to return thousands of work workers, which have recently been removed as part of Donald Trump’s president’s campaign to reduce civil servants.
Earlier it was reported that Trump had warned federal employees that they would be eliminated in the event of his administration’s policy.
News from CORRESPONDENT.NET On the telegram and whatsapp. Subscribe to our channels https://t.me/KorresPondentNet and WhatsApp
Source: korrespondent
I am David Wyatt, a professional writer and journalist for Buna Times. I specialize in the world section of news coverage, where I bring to light stories and issues that affect us globally. As a graduate of Journalism, I have always had the passion to spread knowledge through writing.