The Pechersk court cleared ex-deputy head of the National Police Dmitry Tishlek in the case of illegal gifts.
.in_text_content_22 { width: 300px; height: 600px; } @media(min-width: 600px) { .in_text_content_22 { width: 580px; height: 400px; } }
This is stated in the Bihus.Info investigation
NAPC sent an administrative protocol regarding these violations to the Pechersky District Court of Kyiv, where the case fell apart. The court decided that it was not possible to determine the cost of renting the apartment; at the same time, there is evidence that Tishlek, it turns out, furnished the apartment for 910 thousand hryvnia at his own expense, while NAPC valued this arrangement at only 130 thousand. That is, it seems that this is how the ex-policeman paid for the rent.
Tishlek explained the appearance of such money by the fact that his wife lent 4.5 million hryvnia from her mother, who lives in Russia.
As for the house near Kiev, the court simply concluded that the law enforcement officer did not live there.
As journalists learned, the decision was made by Pechersk Court Judge Svetlana Grechana, who was recently married to a National Police officer. Journalists counted the spouses’ real estate worth 14 million hryvnia, about which nothing is said in Grechanaya’s declarations. Journalists say that it was this judge who previously “buried” the case of the former deputy head of the Presidential Office, Kirill Tymoshenko, who was also suspected of receiving illegal gifts.
Tishlek resigned from the post of deputy head of the National Police after an investigation at the end of 2023. “Bigus” talked about his wife’s Russian passport, his mother-in-law living in Russia, and his gratuitous “liking” with friends with a dubious reputation.
It was through the last point that the NACP drew up a protocol against the ex-official. After all, free stays in someone else’s expensive real estate are incriminated to officials as prohibited gifts. At first, Tishlek and his “landlord” Yuriy Golik “showed up” during their testimony, and then the case was transferred to the Pechersk court.
The judge “excused” the cop as best she could: she ignored obvious facts confirmed by Tishlek himself (and the NAPC), refused to accept some documents, and accepted others – which were more beneficial to Tishlek. And this process itself began to resemble a circus. Although the maximum that “shone” for Tishlek was a fine and confiscation of gifts, they write in “Bigus.info”.
Source: Racurs
I am David Wyatt, a professional writer and journalist for Buna Times. I specialize in the world section of news coverage, where I bring to light stories and issues that affect us globally. As a graduate of Journalism, I have always had the passion to spread knowledge through writing.